OA: D

down to C and D but market option C.

experts pl help:Why D is better than C?

fiza gupta wrote:down to C and D but market option C.

experts pl help:Why D is better than C?

I have some notes from Ron Purewals discussion, I can share those with you. But waiting for experts to Chime in.

Mr. Purewal's Staunch Opinion-

In choosing between C and D, first consider the intended meaning. We're interested in the current likelihood that the comet/asteroid will strike Earth in the future.

In other words, How likely is it NOW that a comet/asteroid WILL STRIKE Earth?

This distinction comes into play when you look at the verbs in C and D. Different verbs.

C mentions "how likely a comet/asteroid will be". Nope. The likelihood is something that exists now, not in the future. (That's the definition of "likelihood": How probable does this event seem right now?
There's no "future likelihood" here. In the future, the event either happens or doesn't happen.)

D mentions the likelihood (as measured at present) that a comet/asteroid will collide (in the future) with Earth. That makes sense.

Furthermore,

The last choice refers to "the likelihood of an asteroid or comet". That doesn't make sense; a physical object doesn't have a "likelihood". We can only talk about the likelihood that something will happen.

'to rate' would be more appropriate for an action that helps the astronomers toward their goal (e.g., To rate the likelihood that asteroids will XXXX, astronomers are measuring their current trajectories with exquisite precision.)

in any case, that's not the major problem with choice C. the major problem with choice C is that likelihood is a PRESENT thing, so 'will be' is inapposite.
i.e., the question the astronomers are trying to answer is "How likely is this asteroid to eventually strike Earth?" that's the probability at present.

This distinction comes into play when you look at the verbs in C and D. Different verbs.

But honestly I am unable to fully grasp the explanation given by Mr. Purewal as both the competing option has "WILL" as a verb. I am unable to distinguish the difference that verbs are creating.




P.S. I would appreciate the staunch discussion on the Idioms of "rate" such as "to rate", "for rating"

Check my two posts here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-ex ... 82473.html

The split between to rate and for rating is meant to distract us.
Both usages are correct.

C: astronomers have developed a scale to rate the likelihood
Here, to rate is an ADVERB serving to modify have developed.
WHY have astronomers developed a scale?
TO RATE the likelihood.
to rate expresses the INTENT of the astronomers.

D: astronomers have developed a scale for rating the likelihood
Here, for rating is an ADJECTIVE serving to modify a scale.
What KIND of scale?
a scale FOR RATING the likelihood.
for rating expresses the PURPOSE of the scale.

Either meaning seems viable.