BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Every year a large percentage of the population of loggerhea

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:41 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Every year a large percentage of the population of loggerhead and leatherback turtles are killed by deep-sea fishing. To protect land animals, habitats of endangered species are fenced off and monitored. This method of protection cannot be implemented in ocean habitats that change position in three dimensions.

If the statements above are correct, they most strongly support which of the following?

A) A method for the protection of moving habitats would have to be developed and implemented to solve the problem of endangered turtles.
B) Conservationists are not working hard enough to develop a protection method for every kind of habitat.
C) In a matter of a few years, loggerhead an leatherback turtles will no longer inhabit the oceans.
D) Other sea animals are also harmed by the fishing industry, and will also become endangered unless the problem is solved.
E) To control and monitor a three-dimensional ocean habitat, an infrared tagging system should be used.

OA A

Source: Economist GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Jun 16, 2019 12:53 pm
Option A :- correct
The statement above most strongly support this option because the moving habitat is an example of a habitat that changes position in three dimensions, hence we can follow this recommendation to solve the problem of endangered turtle.

Option B :- Incorrect
This option is far away from specification; conservationist can only concentrate their efforts on matters that seek urgency and will surely generate a solution when the need arise; this is not affected by the above statement.

Option C :- Incorrect
The method of protection is rather a solution to this potential problem ahead. Hence this conclusion negates the statement above.

Option D :- Incorrect
The statement here is over specified; the main body of the argument focuses on turtles.

Option E :- Incorrect
No method of protection was particularly specified; it will, therefore, be unprofessional to suggest an unverified solution.
Join the discussion