BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Even though

Expert replies
by akhpad » Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:51 pm
Source: Knewton

Even though it is expected that the chain restaurants along Highway 00 in Lowtown will close within three years due to competiton from the popular chain restaurant QuicknYum that just opened, those locations will not stay unoccupied for long. In the three years since the opening of Dinone, a non-chain restaurant, a new restaurant has opened at the location of every restaurant along Highway 00 that closed because it could not compete with Dinone.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A: The strip of Highway 00 that passes through Lowtown currently has as many restaurants as it ever had.
B: It is projected that Lowtown will see more travelers passing through on Highway 00 in the next five years than it has in the past few decades.
C: The restaurants that have opened along Highway 00 since Dinone opened have increasingly been chain restaurants.
D: Many of Dinone's regular diners are expected to do less eating there than they did before the QuicknYum opened.
E: Many restaurants along Highway 00 in Lowtown serve types of food that are not served at either QuicknYum or Dinone.

OA: C
Last edited by akhpad on Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scorpionz » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:33 am
IMO: C

I am not completely sure though..Will appreciate if someone can post answers with explanations!!

OA Plz..??
Join the discussion

by abhigang » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:37 am
akhpad wrote:Source: Knewton

Even though it is expected that the chain restaurants along Highway 00 in Lowtown will close within three years due to competiton from the popular chain restaurant QuicknYum that just opened, those locations will not stay unoccupied for long. In the three years since the opening of Dinone, a non-chain restaurant, a new restaurant has opened at the location of every restaurant along Highway 00 that closed because it could not compete with Dinone.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A: The strip of Highway 00 that passes through Lowtown currently has as many restaurants as it ever had.
B: It is projected that Lowtown will see more travelers passing through on Highway 00 in the next five years than it has in the past few decades.
C: The restaurants that have opened along Highway 00 since Dinone opened have increasingly been chain restaurants.
D: Many of Dinone's regular diners are expected to do less eating there than they did before the QuicknYum opened.
E: Many restaurants along Highway 00 in Lowtown serve types of food that are not served at either QuicknYum or Dinone.
IMO C.

Firstly, others are purely Irrelevant.
Secondly, If Q has justopened then it is because the shop which was there before Q, could not compete with D. Hence there is a chance that Q can also be closed. Hence the conclusion is weakend. Even if Q survives , as denoted by the term "popular", there is no guarantee that other chain restaurants will get closed. Because the author gives a causal relationship between non-chain restaurants and (with answer choice C) chain restaurants. Where as the conclusion is based between chain and chain.
Thus it weakens from all aspects, I believe :)
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:16 pm
I could not find any answer :(

can anyone elaborate
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:40 am
This question is very similar to an official GMAT question. I don't have the link to the actual question but I am 100% sure that this question is just a pattern.
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:43 pm
paddle_sweep wrote:This question is very similar to an official GMAT question. I don't have the link to the actual question but I am 100% sure that this question is just a pattern.
Here, the important thing is that to provide explanation
Join the discussion

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Sep 08, 2010 3:41 pm
Even though it is expected that the chain restaurants along Highway 00 in Lowtown will close within three years due to competiton from the popular chain restaurant QuicknYum that just opened, those locations will not stay unoccupied for long. In the three years since the opening of Dinone, a non-chain restaurant, a new restaurant has opened at the location of every restaurant along Highway 00 that closed because it could not compete with Dinone.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A: The strip of Highway 00 that passes through Lowtown currently has as many restaurants as it ever had.
B: It is projected that Lowtown will see more travelers passing through on Highway 00 in the next five years than it has in the past few decades.
C: The restaurants that have opened along Highway 00 since Dinone opened have increasingly been chain restaurants.

The arguement cites example of a non-chain restaurant opening, and assuming that the trend that followed thereafter will continue in the case of the popular chain restaurant opening too. This should create a red flag since the comparison is not apples to apples. Choice C tells you that the restaurants that open AFTER the non-chain restaurant opened were all chain restaurants. So they weren't direct competitors of Dinone. No other choice brings out the difference between chain and non-chain restaurant.

D: Many of Dinone's regular diners are expected to do less eating there than they did before the QuicknYum opened.
E: Many restaurants along Highway 00 in Lowtown serve types of food that are not served at either QuicknYum or Dinone.
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:55 am
paddle_sweep wrote:This question is very similar to an official GMAT question. I don't have the link to the actual question but I am 100% sure that this question is just a pattern.
Knewton/veritas have this strategy...
Change the subject and you have a new question...
lol...
Join the discussion