BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Evaluate my profile

Launched April 26, 2006
This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:42 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Evaluate my profile

by Stockmoose16 » Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:00 pm
Stacy,

I've posted a couple times before, but I just took the GMAT, so I'm hoping you can re-evaluate my chances of getting into the following schools: Harvard, UCLA, UT Austin, USC, and Duke.


Bio:
-Male
-27 y/o
-Residing in Los Angeles

Undergrad:
-GPA: 3.97 (double major in Television, Radio, Film and Finance)
-Syracuse University '03
-Valedictorian/Class Marshal/Commencement speaker
-Dean's Scholar every semester in both schools
-Finalist, Ball State University National Business Plan Competition
-Studied abroad in London for a semester

GMAT:
-690 (44Q/41V)

Job experience:
- 5 years working in scripted television as writers' assistant (Los Angeles)
-Worked on a few of hit TV shows: "Will & Grace," "The Starter Wife," "What I Like about You"

Do you think I should re-take the GMAT? I had scored a 740 on the GMATprep I took one week before the exam, but realistically, I think the highest I could score on another exam is 720 or so. I spent almost 4 months studying for the exam I just finished, and started off with a 530 baseline.
Top
Source: — Ask Stacy Blackman |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 3845
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Thanked: 442 times
Followed by:148 members

by Lisa Anderson » Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:45 pm
Dear Stockmoose,

Congratulations on your score! I'm not sure it is worth your time to retake the test at this point if you are trying to hit second round deadlines. Of course, a higher score will not hurt you if you are confident you can increase your score. But you are close to the average for your target schools, have a high GPA, and have unique work experience that you can leverage to your advantage. I think your time at this stage will be better spent on putting together stellar application packages. It will be important for you to "connect the dots" for the admissions committees on how your previous experience, MBA, and future goals fit together. Likewise, it is critical for you to make a compelling case for your potential as a future business leader.

Best of luck,
Lisa
Lisa Anderson
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting

Learn more about me
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:42 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by Stockmoose16 » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:04 pm
Lisa Anderson wrote:Dear Stockmoose,

Congratulations on your score! I'm not sure it is worth your time to retake the test at this point if you are trying to hit second round deadlines. Of course, a higher score will not hurt you if you are confident you can increase your score. But you are close to the average for your target schools, have a high GPA, and have unique work experience that you can leverage to your advantage. I think your time at this stage will be better spent on putting together stellar application packages. It will be important for you to "connect the dots" for the admissions committees on how your previous experience, MBA, and future goals fit together. Likewise, it is critical for you to make a compelling case for your potential as a future business leader.

Best of luck,
Lisa
Lisa,

Thanks for your input. Assuming I don't have the time to both study to re-take the GMAT and make the Rd 2 deadlines, I'm wondering what your opinion is on taking a GMAT re-test blindly. Meaning, I don't study at all and take the test again in a month. If I score considerably lower, it won't make any difference, right? From what I've read, the schools only consider your highest GMAT score. Do you think this is a prudent option? I had been scoring in the 710-740 range on my prep tests, so there's a chance I could break 700 on a re-test (although, less likely if I don't study for the entire month).

My worry is that 5 months from now, I'll get my responses back from Harvard and UCLA, and my low GMAT score will be the deciding factor in why I got rejected. At that point, I'd basically have to start from scratch to re-learn all the gmat material and try again. I hate that my score is so borderline. In any other year, it would've been a 700 based on the raw numbers. But instead, it's a 690, and I feel that even though it's statistically equivalent to a 700, Harvard and UCLA are unlikely to see it that way.

What are your thoughts?
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 3845
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Thanked: 442 times
Followed by:148 members

by Lisa Anderson » Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:54 am
Harvard and UCLA understand the "difference" between a 690 and 700--which is basically nothing. I stand by my previous post that your time is better spent on your applications at this point. If you get rejected this year, it will not just be the GMAT that contributes to the decision but other aspects to your profile as well. Get busy and get in some outstanding applications!

Good luck,
Lisa
Lisa Anderson
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting

Learn more about me
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1