Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Evaluate Argument

Expert replies
by yvonne0923 » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:01 pm
Bicycle safety Expert Bicycling on the left half of the road is much more likely to lead to collisions with automobiles than is bicycling on the right. After all, in three different studies of bicycle-automobile collisions, the bicyclist was riding on the left in 15, 17, and 25 percent of the cases, respectively.

Skeptic But in places where a comparatively high percentage of bicyclists used to ride on the left, there was surprisingly little decrease in collisions between bicyclists and automobiles after bicycling on the left was made illegal.

One reason the strength of the bicycle safety expert's argument cannot be evaluated is that....

A. the statistics cited in support of the conclusion is that bicycling on the left is ore likely to lead to collisions with automobiles already presuppose the truth of the conclusion.
B. the statistics it cites do not include the percentage of bicycling that took place on the left.
C. no statistics are provided on the proportion of bicycle accidents that are due to bicycle-automobile collisions.
D. bicycling on the left is singled out for criticism without consideration of other bicycling practices that are unsafe.
E. it does not distinguish between places in which bicycling on the left is legal and places in which it is illegal.











______________________________________________________________________________
[spoiler]Answer:B[/spoiler]

I chose C first, since I'm still confusing about the number of 15,17,and 25 which are provided from the argument.

Thanks,
Yvonne
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by e-GMAT » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:43 pm
This is a good question:OA is B as stated

The argument draws the conclusion that riding on the left is more dangerous based on three studies cited in the argument. Nowhere does it say that what percentage of time or what percentage of bicyclists were driving on the left.

Lets take the study (as an example) that states that in 15% of the cases the bicyclist riding in the left. The argument only holds true if less than 15% of the bicycling was done on the left side. This is because, if more than 15% of the bicycling was done on the left (lets assume 50%) then riding on left is actually safer which refutes the conclusion. Choice B exposes this omission and is the correct choice.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:12 am
yvonne0923 wrote:Bicycle safety Expert Bicycling on the left half of the road is much more likely to lead to collisions with automobiles than is bicycling on the right. After all, in three different studies of bicycle-automobile collisions, the bicyclist was riding on the left in 15, 17, and 25 percent of the cases, respectively.

Skeptic But in places where a comparatively high percentage of bicyclists used to ride on the left, there was surprisingly little decrease in collisions between bicyclists and automobiles after bicycling on the left was made illegal.

One reason the strength of the bicycle safety expert's argument cannot be evaluated is that....

A. the statistics cited in support of the conclusion is that bicycling on the left is ore likely to lead to collisions with automobiles already presuppose the truth of the conclusion.
B. the statistics it cites do not include the percentage of bicycling that took place on the left.
C. no statistics are provided on the proportion of bicycle accidents that are due to bicycle-automobile collisions.
D. bicycling on the left is singled out for criticism without consideration of other bicycling practices that are unsafe.
E. it does not distinguish between places in which bicycling on the left is legal and places in which it is illegal.











______________________________________________________________________________
[spoiler]Answer:B[/spoiler]

I chose C first, since I'm still confusing about the number of 15,17,and 25 which are provided from the argument.

Thanks,
Yvonne
Where did u get this question ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by champmag » Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:43 am
IMO B

The argument of the bicycle safety expert states the percentage of cases in which bicyclist was riding on the left when the accident took place.

Taking the bigger picture, how many percentage of bicyclists from all the bicyclists that ride on the streets were actually riding on the left? This figure is not mentioned in the argument. It might be a possibility that the percentage of byscylists riding on the right are more than those riding on the left. This possibility can weaken the conclusion.

So B fits perfectly.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:14 am
champmag wrote:IMO B

The argument of the bicycle safety expert states the percentage of cases in which bicyclist was riding on the left when the accident took place.

Taking the bigger picture, how many percentage of bicyclists from all the bicyclists that ride on the streets were actually riding on the left? This figure is not mentioned in the argument. It might be a possibility that the percentage of byscylists riding on the right are more than those riding on the left. This possibility can weaken the conclusion.

So B fits perfectly.
What does the percentage of bicyclists from all the bicyclists have to do with bicycling on the left being made illegal ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion