BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Eurasian water milfoil, a weed not native to Frida Lake

Expert replies
by NandishSS » Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:38 am
Eurasian water milfoil, a weed not native to Frida Lake, has reproduced prolifically since being accidentally introduced there. In order to eliminate the weed, biologists proposed treating infested parts of the lake with a certain herbicide that is nontoxic for humans and aquatic animals. However, the herbicide might damage populations of certain rare plant species that the lake contains. For this reason local officials rejected the proposal.

Which of the following, if true, points out the most serious weakness in the officials' grounds for rejecting the biologists' proposal?

A)The continuing spread of Eurasian water milfoil in Frida Lake threatens to choke out the lake's rare plant species.
B) Because of ecological conditions prevailing in its native habitat, Eurasian water milfoil is not as dominant there as it is in Frida Lake.
C) The proliferation of Eurasian water milfoil in Frida Lake has led to reductions in the populations of some species of aquatic animals.
D) Although Eurasian water milfoil could be mechanically removed from Frida Lake, eliminating the weed would take far longer this way than it would using herbicides.
E) Unless Eurasian water milfoil is completely eliminated from Frida Lake, it will quickly spread again once herbicide treatments or other control measures cease.

OA:A

Source :GMATPrep EP2

Please explain POE
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MartyMurray » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:41 pm
(A) Interesting. So the herbicide may damage, i.e. reduce, the populations of the rare plant species, but A says that the Eurasian water milfoil may choke out the rare plant species. Choking out sounds as bad as or worse than damaging populations. So maybe using the herbicide is better than the alternative. This is probably the right answer, but let's check the rest to make sure.

(B) What we are concerned with is what is going in in Frida lake, not how things go elsewhere in a different type of situation.

(C) This is interesting information, but what the officials are clearly concerned about is the rare plants, and this does not address their concerns. In fact, for all we know the officials desire a reduction in the populations of some species of aquatic animals.

(D) At issue is not whether using herbicides is faster or slower than other methods. At issue is the effect of the herbicides on the rare plant populations.

(E) This does not address the officials' concerns about the effects of the herbicides on the rare plants.

So the best answer is A.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by meenakshimiyer » Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:01 pm
Reason for rejection: Herbicides might destroy some population of rare plan species that the lake contains.
Option (A) simply states that if Eurasian milfoil if not treated it might damage populations of certain rare plant species that the lake contains, thus damage to the rare plant species/animals is inevitable. Weed also has other harmful effects. So, avoiding the use of herbicides won't be helpful. Hence, A is the answer.
Join the discussion