BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Error in the OG 11th edition or have I lost it?

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:14 pm
by lastinclass » Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:27 pm
Hello all,

I am just wondering if I've officially lost it due to studying too long or if there is an error for example 10 Data Interpretation on page 145 in the 11th OG?

The question asks "How many people are 44 years old or younger?"

Unless I'm losing it, shouldn't the answer be obtained from adding 63,376 and 43,845? (the numbers from the 17yrs and under and the 18-44 age group. Not by adding 63,376 and 86,738-which is the 17yrs and under and the 45-64 age group as stated in the OG.

Any confirmation of this would be appreciated.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:25 pm

by briendownie » Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:27 pm
no, you're definitely losing it :D

my table reads:

>17 -- 63,376
18<age<44 -- 86,738

you're getting the concept right; under 17 + 18-44, but you're reading the table wrong.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:37 pm
Location: Dallas

by blaque831 » Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:58 am
lastinclass, I have the same thing in my og. We've been had. I want my money back.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1