BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

equations

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Whitney Garner » Wed May 11, 2011 11:21 am
Hi alltimeacheiver!

Let us first start by rephrasing the stem. Since we do not know the price per hotdog or the price per soda, we need variables:

h = $ of 1 hotdog
s = $ of 1 soda

The question then asks: what is (3h + 2s)?

This is a classic "Combo" problem. We could find the answer if we were ever able to solve for the price of each hotdog and the price of each soda separately, BUT we could also solve if we could build the combination (3h + 2s) from one of the answer choices.

Statement (1): We can translate this to: 5s < 2h

- We could try to simplify a bit: s < 2h/5 or 5s/2 < h, but we don't have a specific value to plug into the original combo. For example. I could say that 3h+2s = 3h+2(something<2h/5) but this result still has variables and really doesn't nail down a value. INSUFFICIENT

Statement (2): We can translate this to: 9h + 6s = 21.

- because everything has a common divisor (3) we should start by dividing that through: 3h+2s=7. Now remember what the original question asked - it wanted to know the value of 3h+2s, and we just found it!! 3h+2s=7.

- alternatively, we could have solved for either the h or the s and plugged into the "combo".
6s=21-9h
s=7/2 - 3h/2

Plug this back into the combo for s:
3h+2s = 3h+2(7/2-3h/2) = 3h+7-3h = 7

Because we were able to solve to a real number (no variable), this statement is SUFFICIENT.

The answer is B


I hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion