BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

environment regulation

Expert replies
by cathy0929 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:07 am
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A.those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B.even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C.many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D.after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E.even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

the answer is A, i choose C.

and do not know why? any relationship between thr economic growth and the investment in education and job training.

:?:
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:00 am
cathy0929 ..


in my opinion.. this is an example of scope shift..

the author talks abt economic growth in the premises and then asks reasoning abt just growth in general..



This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since



so as environmental policies does both increase economic growth and also decrease economic growth..we have to look for some other reason for growth( in general ).. for this A suggests a different reason for growth in countries with strict environmental policies..

even i took quite a long time to figure this out and i can be wrong also..:)

gr8 quality of questions..keep posting!! :)


thx
Join the discussion

by cathy0929 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:56 am
raunekk:

your rationale is reasonable. "this fact does not show....., howver, since..." from a rhetorical point of view, there must be some other things contributing the economic growth

thank you very much

:!: :D
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:05 am
cathy0929 wrote:raunekk:

your rationale is reasonable. "this fact does not show....., howver, since..." from a rhetorical point of view, there must be some other things contributing the economic growth

thank you very much

:!: :D



Guys ..tip here..

whenever u see a sentence of the TYPE ..
XXXASDFGH Howver,since Place However at the start and then re read the sentence of the type\
Howver,XXXASDFGH,since
for better understanding
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:49 pm
raunekk wrote:cathy0929 ..


in my opinion.. this is an example of scope shift..

the author talks abt economic growth in the premises and then asks reasoning abt just growth in general..



This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since



so as environmental policies does both increase economic growth and also decrease economic growth..we have to look for some other reason for growth( in general ).. for this A suggests a different reason for growth in countries with strict environmental policies..

even i took quite a long time to figure this out and i can be wrong also..:)

gr8 quality of questions..keep posting!! :)


thx
@raunekk

I was debating whether A is a right choice. However, A seems the only plausible one. But dont you think we make an assumption, a subtle on, that education... promotes growth? Is that ok to do so?
Join the discussion