BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Enrollment

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:48 am
Source: veritas Prep [800score]

Enrollment in computer training programs tends to be high in a strong economy and much lower during weak economic times. How individuals view the likelihood of future job availability, therefore, affects people's willingness to pass up immediate their current employment opportunities in order to invest in career-related training.

The argument above assumes that:

A. those who enroll in computer training schools during a strong economy help increase the economy's strength.
B. computer training programs admit fewer students during recessions.
C. perceptions of the likelihood of job availability are related to the state of the economy.
D. the perceived likelihood of job availability has decreased in recent years.
E. all those who avoid computer training school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

OA: C

Why E is wrong??
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mundasingh123 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:08 am
YellowSapphire wrote:Source: veritas Prep [800score]
Enrollment in computer training programs tends to be high in a strong economy and much lower during weak economic times. How individuals view the likelihood of future job availability, therefore, affects people's willingness to pass up immediate their current employment opportunities in order to invest in career-related training.
E. all those who avoid computer training school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
quote]
I chose C as soon as i read it.I kind of prephrased it.
I chose to eliminate E because
1)The conclusion talks abt career-related training, it has no mention of Computer training school.
2)f someone were to avoid computer training school for reasons other than perceived lack of future jobs for example "lack of funds, lack of interest in Computers,it doesnt destroy the Conclusion
3)Some will say that E is too extreme since it talks abt All the Students.
This was what i found by applying the Negation Technique
But after rereading my response, I checked if it bridges the gap between the premise and the conclusion.It doesnt bridge the gap between Enrollment in computer training programs and prediction abt Future Job Availability
Join the discussion