BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Enrollment

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:48 am
Source: veritas Prep [800score]

Enrollment in computer training programs tends to be high in a strong economy and much lower during weak economic times. How individuals view the likelihood of future job availability, therefore, affects people's willingness to pass up immediate their current employment opportunities in order to invest in career-related training.

The argument above assumes that:

A. those who enroll in computer training schools during a strong economy help increase the economy's strength.
B. computer training programs admit fewer students during recessions.
C. perceptions of the likelihood of job availability are related to the state of the economy.
D. the perceived likelihood of job availability has decreased in recent years.
E. all those who avoid computer training school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

OA: C

Why E is wrong??
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mundasingh123 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:08 am
YellowSapphire wrote:Source: veritas Prep [800score]
Enrollment in computer training programs tends to be high in a strong economy and much lower during weak economic times. How individuals view the likelihood of future job availability, therefore, affects people's willingness to pass up immediate their current employment opportunities in order to invest in career-related training.
E. all those who avoid computer training school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
quote]
I chose C as soon as i read it.I kind of prephrased it.
I chose to eliminate E because
1)The conclusion talks abt career-related training, it has no mention of Computer training school.
2)f someone were to avoid computer training school for reasons other than perceived lack of future jobs for example "lack of funds, lack of interest in Computers,it doesnt destroy the Conclusion
3)Some will say that E is too extreme since it talks abt All the Students.
This was what i found by applying the Negation Technique
But after rereading my response, I checked if it bridges the gap between the premise and the conclusion.It doesnt bridge the gap between Enrollment in computer training programs and prediction abt Future Job Availability
Join the discussion