BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Employment Costs

Expert replies
by zaarathelab » Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:58 am
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the
year that ended in the previous quarter.

(A) less than they did
(B) less than it did
(C) less than they were
(D) lower than
(E) lower than they were

[spoiler]Isn't Employment costs countable? I chose D. OA IS A[/spoiler]
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sam2304 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:06 am
It is comparing the rising of costs in both the years and not the costs themselves. So A is right. Correct me if i am wrong :)
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:17 am
zaarathelab wrote:Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the
year that ended in the previous quarter.

(A) less than they did
(B) less than it did
(C) less than they were
(D) lower than
(E) lower than they were

[spoiler]Isn't Employment costs countable? I chose D. OA IS A[/spoiler]
less : it can act as an adjective ( noun modifier), adverb( verb modifier ) and as a noun
lower : always act as an adjective

Not let apply this rule into this problem :

In this sentence "slightly less ( adv + adv)" is acting as an adverb modifying : "they did", which stands for "Employment costs rose .........."
In D, since "lower" is an adjective it wont serve the purpose - to modify a action - here we need an adverb not an adjective.
D would look like this :
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly(adv) lower(adj) than in the year that ended in the previous quarter.
I hope you got why D is wrong.


I hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:20 am
Can you please tell me the source of this problem. It seems to be a OG problem but I havent came across this problem in OG-12 and verbal review. Is it from OG-11 or OG-10 ?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1