BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Employer and Employee

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times
by piyush_nitt » Sun Mar 22, 2009 3:09 am
Oa later!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:10 am

by subhasis8877 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:30 am
I guess answer is C
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:07 am
would go for A

conclusion: employers are partially responsible for the unions demanding prohibitively high prices

A. correct. the first bf is indeed a background information. the second is the conclusion

B. the first is not an evidence for the conlusion (the second boldface). the first bf is just a background info

C. the first is not an inference, if it were it wouldnt be stated in the stimulus in the first place

D. was tied between A and D. discarded D as it not defend the authors position (the second bf). the first bf is just a background info.

E. the second bf is not an evidence. it is the conclusion.
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times

by S0laris » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:32 am
IMO - C, bc 1-st bolded can be inferred indeed, and it has no influence on the 2-nd phrase, thus choices which extremely ties 1-st and 2-nd can be omitted.
we are the champions !
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times

by S0laris » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:37 am
scoobydooby wrote:would go for A


A. correct. the first bf is indeed a background information. the second is the conclusion
it is a background info, but how is it necessary to drawn conclusion(as A states) ?
I think conclusion(2-nd) survives without 1-st bolded.
we are the champions !
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:20 am
S0laris wrote:
scoobydooby wrote:would go for A


A. correct. the first bf is indeed a background information. the second is the conclusion
it is a background info, but how is it necessary to drawn conclusion(as A states) ?
I think conclusion(2-nd) survives without 1-st bolded.
I think it is necessary since it says in 2nd that the employers 'allowed' which can happen if they were in power.
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:59 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Kunal_gmat » Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:56 pm
IMO A
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times

by S0laris » Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:10 pm
delhiboy1979 wrote:
S0laris wrote:
scoobydooby wrote:would go for A


A. correct. the first bf is indeed a background information. the second is the conclusion
it is a background info, but how is it necessary to drawn conclusion(as A states) ?
I think conclusion(2-nd) survives without 1-st bolded.
I think it is necessary since it says in 2nd that the employers 'allowed' which can happen if they were in power.
IMO 1-st bolded can be inferred from this:
1 - employees banded in unions in an attempt to create a greater ballance of power.... - means that ballance was not so great before as it became after. So, considering only 2 sides: employees and employer, it is possible to infer that: The employer held the majority of the power in this relationship - thus, it seems like an inference and nothing more.

By allowing unions to survive... - is not the conclusion already, but another premise
...employers are partially responsible for current environment... - this is main conclusion
we are the champions !
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 4:32 am

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 2:43 am
I believe the answer should be A
Top
Join the discussion