BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Prep Geometry Question

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by ri2007 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:04 am
Diameter is 18 so circumference of semi circle = 18 pi /2 = 9 pi

PQ ll OR so angle R = angle P = 35

so arc OP = arc QR = 35 * 2 = 70

so arc PQ = 180 - ( arc OP + arc QR) = 40 deg

Since 180 deg corresponds to 9 pi

40 corresponds to 2 pi ( cross multiplication)
Join the discussion

by ssy » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:13 am
Thank you ri2007 but I am still confused.

Isn't the circumference of the semicircle (pi)(radius)+2pi, so the circumference in this case is [(pi)(9)+18]

Also, can you please explain the following steps

"so arc OP = arc QR = 35 * 2 = 70

so arc PQ = 180 - ( arc OP + arc QR) = 40 deg"

Thanks very much.
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:34 am
Point 1) Circumference is 2 pi r or 2 pi d where d is the diameter,

Point 2) since PQ ll OR and angle R & angle P are the internal angles formed by the transversal - internal angles are equal.

Point 3) semicircle = 180 degrees
Join the discussion

by Suyog » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:55 pm
I'm also lil confused!
if angle R = 35 then how arc OP = 70 ??
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:21 pm
Suyog wrote:I'm also lil confused!
if angle R = 35 then how arc OP = 70 ??
Its a geometry rule of inscribed angle
minor arc is 2* inscribed angle
Join the discussion

by ssy » Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:40 am
Sorry I am still confused.

Point 1) Do you mean the circumference of a semi circle because isn't the circumference of the semi circle (pi)(radius)+diameter?

https://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/in ... n6D&show=7

Point 3) How can you subtract the length of the two arcs from 180 degrees?
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:03 am
ssy wrote:Sorry I am still confused.

Point 1) Do you mean the circumference of a semi circle because isn't the circumference of the semi circle (pi)(radius)+diameter?

https://sg.answers.yahoo.com/question/in ... n6D&show=7

Point 3) How can you subtract the length of the two arcs from 180 degrees?
I have made one typing error earlier in explaining the formula for circumference of circle it is 2 pi r or pi d no 2 pi d as typed earlier by mistake. This is the right formula

THis questions is either from OG or Kaplan. They have also give an explaination. You can check it
Join the discussion

by manasi_sh » Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:41 am
Also there is a formula for Length of Arc:
degree measure(here 40)/360* 2 PI R(circumference formula)
so over here Arc PQ = 40/360 *(2PI*9) = 2PI(ANS)
Join the discussion

by 800GMAT » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:49 pm
Some relevant properties:
Attachments
1.JPG
Join the discussion

by xcise_science » Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:00 am
can someone explain this part to me:

Since 180 deg corresponds to 9 pi
40 corresponds to 2 pi ( cross multiplication)

I'm not clear on how/why 180 corresponds to 9pi.

thanks
Join the discussion

by gkumar » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:42 am
I'm still unclear why the degree measures of minor arcs PAO and QAR are equal. I understand why PAO has a measure 70 degrees, but not why QAR has a measure of 70 degrees. Can you please explain via a proof or some other explanation on how angles QAR = PAO?

Here's what I know so far (see attachment)
Attachments
circle_106.jpg
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:24 pm
gkumar wrote:I'm still unclear why the degree measures of minor arcs PAO and QAR are equal. I understand why PAO has a measure 70 degrees, but not why QAR has a measure of 70 degrees. Can you please explain via a proof or some other explanation on how angles QAR = PAO?

Here's what I know so far (see attachment)
Hi!

We know that angle APQ is 70 degrees (35+35). We also know that triangle APQ is isosceles, since both AP and AQ are radii of the circle.

Therefore, angle AQP is also 70 degrees, leaving 40 degrees for central angle PAQ.

So, PAO is 70 and PAQ is 40. 180 - 110 = 70 degrees left over for angle QAR.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by gkumar » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:35 pm
Thanks Stuart! I forgot about the isoceles triangle part. All of these angles are hard to keep track and manage under 2 minutes. Is it possible to use Symmetry to assume that QAR is automatically equal to PAO?
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:39 pm
gkumar wrote:Thanks Stuart! I forgot about the isoceles triangle part. All of these angles are hard to keep track and manage under 2 minutes. Is it possible to use Symmetry to assume that QAR is automatically equal to PAO?
We need to careful not to assume that everything will be symmetrical, so it's not a safe bet.

However, the fact that all triangles radiating out from the centre of a circle are isosceles is commonly tested, so be on the lookout for such situations.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion