BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Emissions

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:34 am
Emissions from automobiles that burn gasoline and
automobiles that burn diesel fuel are threatening the
quality of life on our planet, contaminating both
urban air and global atmosphere. Therefore, the only
effective way to reduce such emissions is to replace
the conventional diesel fuel and gasoline used in
automobiles with cleaner-burning fuels, such as
methanol, that create fewer emissions.
Which one of the following is an assumption on
which the argument depends?
(A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not
be a more effective means to reduce
automobile emissions than the use of
methanol.
(B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is
cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and
gasoline.
(C) If given a choice of automobile fuels,
automobile owners would not select
gasoline over methanol.
(D) Automobile emissions constitute the most
serious threat to the global environment.
(E) At any given time there is a direct correlation
between the level of urban air pollution and
the level of contamination present in the
global atmosphere.

OA :After discussion... :D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by maihuna » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:50 am
IMO: A

Since author believes that only way to reduce pollution is change of fuel, author must have ruled out other alternate mechanism, which may reduce pollution, such as less automobile.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by raghavakumar85 » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:35 am
A says reducing the use of automobiles. But, the argument does not mention anything about reducing the use of automobiles. Not in Premise.

B) There is no fuel other than methanol that can replace gasoline n diesel fuel - the only choice effectively presented in the premise of the argument.

IMO B. Correct me If I am wrong.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:40 am
Join the discussion

by raghavakumar85 » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:50 am
Okay. When I apply denial test, A passes.

But not when I directly look for an assumption from the choices.
Join the discussion

by 2010gmat » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:20 am
the only effective way to reduce such emissions is to replace the conventional diesel fuel and gasoline used in automobiles with cleaner-burning fuels

this is the key here...if we negate A i.e reducing th use of automobiles will reduce emmisions then the argument falls apart...
Join the discussion

by palvarez » Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:26 pm
After boiling down to two choices A and B, look at "such as". B focuses on methanol vs other clean burning fuels. A focuses on clean burning fuels vs. reducing the use.

Trap to learn: trip test takers on some appositive crap!

"cleaner-burning fuels, such as methanol"

(A) Reducing the use of automobiles would not
be a more effective means to reduce
automobile emissions than the use of
methanol.
(B) There is no fuel other than methanol that is
cleaner-burning than both diesel fuel and
gasoline.
Join the discussion

by AdamSkoreyko » Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:11 pm
The answer can not be B since in the initial question it is worded as "cleaner-burning fuels, such as methanol," indicating that there is several suitable fuels and methanol is just one example of such a fuel.

A is the correct answer.
Join the discussion

by mmon » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:00 am
Good explanation. A is the answer.
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:04 pm
In my opinion A is the most logical one.
Join the discussion