BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!

We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Emily Dickinson

Expert replies
by umaa » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:29 pm
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering

B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage o Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbered

D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering

E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

Pls post your opinions with explanations.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

IMHO

by kc_raj » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:47 pm
IMHO A,

beginning, ending is parallel and then gerund outnumbering is correctly used.
Join the discussion

Re: Emily Dickinson

by shahdevine » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:07 pm
umaa wrote:Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's D€@th in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's D€@th in 1886, outnumbering

B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage o Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's D€@th in 1886, outnumber

C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's D€@th in 1886 and outnumbered

D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's D€@th in 1886, and outnumbering

E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's D€@th in 1886, outnumber

Pls post your opinions with explanations.
E for me. although A looked enticing.

the relative clause "which were written" is a little dislocated but grammatically sound, no rules are broken...if you eliminate the relative clause, you have a good simple sentence -->"Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington outnumber her letters to anyone else."

pls provide oa.
Join the discussion

by umaa » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:12 pm
Don't you think WHICH modifies DICKINSON?

Its a common rule that WHICH modified the noun preceding it. Don't you think so?

By the way the OA is E.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by shahdevine » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:23 pm
umaa wrote:Don't you think WHICH modifies DICKINSON?

Its a common rule that WHICH modified the noun preceding it. Don't you think so?

By the way the OA is E.
I feel you that's why A looked enticing. The rule actually is a pronoun must always refer to a clear unmistakable antecedent. In most cases for most sentences, the relative pronoun "who, that, which, whom, etc." follows the antecedent immediately for absolute concision and clarity. If it does not it does not mean its bad, it means its "dislocated" and you have to check if the antecedent is clear. In this sentence in answer E, the "which" clearly modifies the "letters." No discrepancy, because it says "which were written." Also, "which" modifies things not persons...so even although "which" immediately follows "Dickenson" it cannot modify her.

You got this!
Join the discussion

by Spring2009 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 5:41 pm
I am not convinced with the OA.
WHICH doesn't modify Dickinson, it modifies LETTERS. So OA can't be E.

I chose A because I don't see anything wrong with it. OUTNUMBERING modifies the main clause.
Join the discussion

by umaa » Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:18 pm
shahdevine,

still i'm not convinced. WHICH always refers its preceding. Not even the phrase or clause preceding it. If that is the case, how do you say WHICH refers LETTERS?
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1