There are several ways to analyse the statement but it must be within the confine of the contextual features.

Option A - INCORRECT
There seems to be no observable difference between the underlined sentences in this sentence when compared with the original underlined sentence in the question. It is thus in applicable.

Option B - INCORRECT
There is a confusing and contradictory statement in relation to the author's perspectives here. Grammatically faulty analogy of the subject statement.

Option C - INCORRECT
There is a contradictory opinion and perspective to the particles and their mode of exhibition which isn't clearly differentiated in this option statement.

Option D - INCORRECT
There are two perspectives here, one is the similarities and the second is the mode of exhibiting the wave-like characteristics. However, the option only analysed it such that it shows just the similarities neglecting the other.

Option E - CORRECT
The option captures correctly the intention of the writer which seeks to explain that, "however similar the charged particles could be when compared with ordinary particles, they still exhibit other features of wave.