BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

electricity would revolutionize agriculture-Official guide

Expert replies
by sitar » Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:55 pm
Hi everyone -
Official guide - question 12
According to a prediction of the not-so-distant future published in 1940, electricity would revolutionize
agriculture. Electrodes would be inserted into the soil, and the current between them would kill bugs and weeds
and make crop plants stronger.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the logic of the prediction above is flawed?
(A) In order for farmers to avoid electric shock while working in the fields, the current could be turned off at
such times without diminishing the intended effects.
(B) If the proposed plan for using electricity were put into practice, farmers would save on chemicals now
being added to the soil.
(C) It cannot be taken for granted that the use of electricity is always beneficial.
(D) Since weeds are plants, electricity would affect weeds in the same way as it would affect crop plants.
(E) Because a planting machine would need to avoid coming into contact with the electrodes, new parts for
planting machines would need to be designed.

Guide explains correct answer is D, which I also thought. But I eliminated D thinking that in the question itself it is clearly written that current from this machine would work on weeds and bug.
Aren't we suppose to consider the question statement as true?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sitar » Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:56 pm
Sorry - a correction - question 4.
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:52 am
sitar wrote:Hi everyone -
Official guide - question 12
According to a prediction of the not-so-distant future published in 1940, electricity would revolutionize
agriculture. Electrodes would be inserted into the soil, and the current between them would kill bugs and weeds
and make crop plants stronger.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the logic of the prediction above is flawed?
(A) In order for farmers to avoid electric shock while working in the fields, the current could be turned off at
such times without diminishing the intended effects.
(B) If the proposed plan for using electricity were put into practice, farmers would save on chemicals now
being added to the soil.
(C) It cannot be taken for granted that the use of electricity is always beneficial.
(D) Since weeds are plants, electricity would affect weeds in the same way as it would affect crop plants.
(E) Because a planting machine would need to avoid coming into contact with the electrodes, new parts for
planting machines would need to be designed.

Guide explains correct answer is D, which I also thought. But I eliminated D thinking that in the question itself it is clearly written that current from this machine would work on weeds and bug.
Aren't we suppose to consider the question statement as true?
First, we have to accept any premise offered in an argument as fact, but clearly, we don't have to accept a conclusion (or prediction) as fact. (How could a prediction be a fact? And if it were a fact, how could we show it was flawed?) But even if we accept the claim that the current will kill the weeds and bugs as fact, D would still destroy the prediction that plants would become stronger, as the current would also kill the plants. So it clearly indicates a flaw in the logic of the argument.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion