Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Elders.. tough one...

Expert replies
by nervesofsteel » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:14 pm
24. An unbiased observer of everyday encounters in Western societies would surely not find many instances of unkindness by people under 65 toward people over 65. There are undoubtedly incidents of unkindness based on age, and these warrant reproof. However, the very fact that such reproof occurs and is generally accepted implies that our Western societies basically respect the elderly. The same conclusion can be drawn from a recent survey finding: 71 percent of the under 65 population agreed with the statement that “people over 65 receive too little respect from society”, while only 44 percent of the over-65 population, the target of the alleged irreverence agreed with it.
The author concludes that Western societies basically respect the elderly partly because
(A) people under 65 are just as kind to people over 65 as they are to people of their own age group
(B) survey data suggest that fewer people over 65 than under 65 get too little respect
(C) disrespect for the elderly does not go so far as to result in actual harm
(D) survey data suggest that people over 65 are more aware of incidents involving disrespect to the elderly than are people under 65
(E) incidents of unkindness to the elderly are neither common nor generally accepted in Western societies


OA E

Please explain the reasoning...
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by viju9162 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:50 am
tough to crack ...I thought C to be the answer
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

Re: Elders.. tough one...

by vyomb » Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:21 am
nervesofsteel wrote:24. An unbiased observer of everyday encounters in Western societies would surely not find many instances of unkindness by people under 65 toward people over 65. There are undoubtedly incidents of unkindness based on age, and these warrant reproof. However, the very fact that such reproof occurs and is generally accepted implies that our Western societies basically respect the elderly. The same conclusion can be drawn from a recent survey finding: 71 percent of the under 65 population agreed with the statement that “people over 65 receive too little respect from society”, while only 44 percent of the over-65 population, the target of the alleged irreverence agreed with it.
The author concludes that Western societies basically respect the elderly partly because
(A) people under 65 are just as kind to people over 65 as they are to people of their own age group--no mention as such data neither in the premise nor in conlcusion-eliminate
(B) survey data suggest that fewer people over 65 than under 65 get too little respect-nothing as such mentiond in the conclusion-eliminate
(C) disrespect for the elderly does not go so far as to result in actual harm--there is no mention of any harm only unkindness is mentioned-eliminate
(D) survey data suggest that people over 65 are more aware of incidents involving disrespect to the elderly than are people under 65--no such statistical dat present in the premise or conlcusion to prove this-eliminate
(E) incidents of unkindness to the elderly are neither common nor generally accepted in Western societies--incidents of unkindness warrant reproof why?? because they are not generally accepted


OA E

Please explain the reasoning...
Join the discussion

by ogbeni » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:52 pm
Answer is E

Interesting question. This is more like a RC question because it is asking for what premise(s) the conclusion rests upon. So just go straight to the stimulus.

"There are undoubtedly incidents of unkindness based on age, and these warrant reproof (proof that in incidents of unkindness are not common - earlier sentence reads "would surely not find many instances of unkindness by people under 65 toward people over 65"). However, the very fact that such reproof occurs and is generally accepted (proof that in incidents of unkindness to the elderly are not accepted)implies that our Western societies basically respect the elderly."
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:29 pm
What is the source of the question?
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:03 pm
the source is 1000 CR
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:51 pm
Guys can anyone give a decent reason why E is not right.
Join the discussion