BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Egypt pyramids

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:22 amFollowed by: 8 members
Thanked: 12 times
by AnjaliOberoi » Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:14 am
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the
army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his
afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete
them.
A. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them
B. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete it
C. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete
D. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 years to complete
E. to complete them too 700,000 artisans more than 36 years

OA C, why not B...C sounds incomplete and also what is the issue with D..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pmFollowed by: 34 members
Thanked: 448 times
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:09 am
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete
them.
A. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them
INCORRECT; "terra-cotta warriors" is already the subject of the sentence.. we don't need "them" to refer back to "terra-cotta warriors" .. that's redundancy ..


B. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete it
INCORRECT; "terra-cotta warriors" is already the subject of the sentence.. we don't need "it" to refer back to "terra-cotta warriors" .. that's redundancy ..

C. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete

D. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 years to complete
INCORRECT; run-on sentence - two independent clauses connected with "and"

E. to complete them too 700,000 artisans more than 36 years
INCORRECT; awkward.......
R A H U L
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:22 amFollowed by: 8 members
Thanked: 12 times

by AnjaliOberoi » Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:14 pm
Still not able to get.. :(
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 2:08 am

by shinys » Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:07 am
Try seeing it this way:
verb-ing modifier, the army of terra-cotta warriors verb-ed modifier + Prepositional phrase is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pmFollowed by: 247 members
Thanked: 1443 times

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:00 pm
The issue here is PARALLELISM. First, strip away all of the modifiers:

(Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement,) THE ARMY (of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife) IS more than 2,000 years old AND TOOK 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them.

Rahul, be careful - the subject is not "terra cotta warriors," it is "army."

The AND tells us that we need a parallel list: The army is... and took...[/i]

We can't say "the army took artisans more than 36 years to complete them," we just say "to complete."

In D, if we say "700,000 artisans took..." then we're starting a new independent clause. That would only work if there was a comma before AND. Since there is no comma, we can't start a new clause, and "took" has to go with the subject "army."
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1