BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

editorial

Expert replies
by aerodan1 » Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:00 pm
taken from monday, april 19, 2010 editorial in the metrowest daily news.

"A national sales tax imposed at each stage of the supply chain from production to cash register, it raises consumer prices, sometimes substantially".

the pronoun it refers correctly to the antecedent "a national sales tax..." I dont see how this type of sentence could ever fly on the gmat, because it would need context to be defined, and gmat sc problems are one sentence each. Just for reference, the preceding statements in this editorial are as follows:

"The value-added tax has a lot of disadvantages. It is inflationary". Then it follows with the sentence that I discussed above.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sk818020 » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:14 pm
I believe the pronoun is actually ambiguous and unneccesary. For example take out the modifier and view the sentence;

"A national sales tax it raises consumer prices..."

The modifier being "imposed at each stage of the supply chain from poduction to cash register,"

The pronoun has no antecedent. Not real sure how you would rewrite it though.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:44 am
Don't you think the sentence you mentioned is the case of RUN ON SENTENCE. both the clauses in the sentence are independent and a conjunction is needed to join both.

4 correct forms could be:

A national sales tax imposed at each stage of the supply chain from production to cash register, AND it raises consumer prices, sometimes substantially.

A national sales tax imposed at each stage of the supply chain from production to cash register RAISES consumer prices, sometimes substantially

AS a national sales tax imposed at each stage of the supply chain from production to cash register, it raises consumer prices, sometimes substantially

A national sales tax imposed at each stage of the supply chain from production to cash register; it raises consumer prices, sometimes substantially

See the details and reply.....[/b]
Join the discussion

by subgeeth » Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:57 am
I agree with FightwithGMAT it seems to be a run on sentence
Still working on my dreams best part is I have not achieved one yet !!!!!
Join the discussion

by aerodan1 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:42 pm
the sentence does not contain 2 independent clauses though...the first clause has no working verb. the first clause does not contain a relative noun or subordinate indicator or any of that stuff, but without a verb, cannot be considered an independent clause. I think the only possible sentence that fightthegmat presented that would keep the meaning the same and be grammatically correct is the third sentence. The first and 4th depend on the first clause being independent, and the 2nd changes the meaning. I am still confused tho, as to whether the orignal is correct.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1