BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Editor

Expert replies
by moonlite » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our articles, but surprisingly there is good reason to believe that the word count it provides is inaccurate. Several times when an article's words were carefully counted by our most reliable copy editor, the resulting count differed from the count the computer gave.

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?

(A) The criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.
(B) The inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself.
(C) It would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately.
(D) A careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
(E) The accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring.

Please explain the OA - D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ketkoag » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:49 pm
answer is D because in the argument the it has not been mentioned that the most reliable copy editor is accurate than the machine and this is necessary for the comparison made in the conclusion to be true. So this is an assumption made by the argument. thus other choices are irrelevant.
hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by moonlite » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:10 pm
It sure does! Thanks.
Join the discussion

by 4seasoncentre » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:47 pm
(A) The criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.
the editor does not assume this. If this were the problem, the editor would not think the computer was being inaccurate.
(B) The inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself.
The editor does not assume this. The editor would believe that this could be a potential explanation.
(C) It would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately.
the editor does not assume this. if he/she did, he/she would probably modify it!
(D) A careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
(E) The accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring.
Out of scope. No reason to believe the editor assumes this.
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 4:19 am
I feel the answer will be D.
Join the discussion