BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Editor

Expert replies
by moonlite » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our articles, but surprisingly there is good reason to believe that the word count it provides is inaccurate. Several times when an article's words were carefully counted by our most reliable copy editor, the resulting count differed from the count the computer gave.

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?

(A) The criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.
(B) The inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself.
(C) It would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately.
(D) A careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
(E) The accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring.

Please explain the OA - D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ketkoag » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:49 pm
answer is D because in the argument the it has not been mentioned that the most reliable copy editor is accurate than the machine and this is necessary for the comparison made in the conclusion to be true. So this is an assumption made by the argument. thus other choices are irrelevant.
hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by moonlite » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:10 pm
It sure does! Thanks.
Join the discussion

by 4seasoncentre » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:47 pm
(A) The criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.
the editor does not assume this. If this were the problem, the editor would not think the computer was being inaccurate.
(B) The inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself.
The editor does not assume this. The editor would believe that this could be a potential explanation.
(C) It would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately.
the editor does not assume this. if he/she did, he/she would probably modify it!
(D) A careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
(E) The accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring.
Out of scope. No reason to believe the editor assumes this.
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 4:19 am
I feel the answer will be D.
Join the discussion