wat is resultant ....
it must be damaged cartilage and bone
it doesn't make sense that cartilage and bone modifying resultant disease...
Ans is E
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Edited by fibbonnaci: cytokines
I didn't get the concept of ||ism here...request one of the experts to please explainEbrahimHashem wrote:I chose E too, but the official answer is B, which I'm not convinced about! The following is the official explanation for the answer:
"The lengthy intervening phrase characterized by cartilage and bone....the immune system masks the subject/verb problem. The singular subject autoimmune disease doesn't agree with the plural verb are . You can eliminate (A), (C) and (D). Choices (B) and (E) both use the correct singular verb ' , but only (B) is correct. (E) lacks the parallelism that (B) retains: that become damaged although...not actually attacked."
I got the question (and answer) from one of Kaplan online courses!
Any thoughts and comments on the official answer and explanation?
Ebrahim Hashem wrote: I chose E too, but the official answer is B, which I'm not convinced about! The following is the official explanation for the answer:
Yaa Ibrahim, I agree and I am not convinced yet.
Yaa Ibrahim, I agree and I am not convinced yet.
The key here is understanding what the sentence is saying and taking a step back from the mechanics. There is a causal relationship that is implied ("resultant"). Saying x is characterized by y means when there's x, there is always y. Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease, but an autoimmune disease is not always a rheumatoid arthritis.Haaress wrote:Ebrahim Hashem wrote: I chose E too, but the official answer is B, which I'm not convinced about! The following is the official explanation for the answer:
Yaa Ibrahim, I agree and I am not convinced yet.
The sentence we are looking at is saying that there is a type of autoimmune disease known as rheumatoid arthritis. And, this type of autoimmune disease is characterized by cartilage and bone that become damaged as a result of this disease. There is an indirect causal relationship here, and it's important to say cartilage and bone that BECOME damaged (the implication is that this damage happens as a result of the inflammation).
"...the resultant autoimmune disease, characterized by cartilage and bone that become damaged although they are not actually attacked by the immune system, is known as 'rheumatoid arthritis.'"
If you were to say, "...the resultant autoimmune disease, characterized by damaged cartilage and bone although they are not actually attacked by the immune system, is known as 'rheumatoid arthritis,'" you are disregarding the causation there and saying that the damaged cartilage and bone characterized the disease. But, they do not. The autoimmune disease is characterized by cartilage and bone that become damaged because of the inflammation.
I don't know if this helps at all.
Gio












