BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Economist: In 2015, the average per-person amount paid

Expert replies
by AbeNeedsAnswers » Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:14 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Economist: In 2015, the average per-person amount paid for goods and services purchased by consumers in Country X was the equivalent of $17,570 in United States dollars, just 30 percent of the corresponding figure of $58,566 for Country Y. Yet in 2015, there was already a substantial middle class in Country X that had discretionary income for middle-class consumer goods such as new vehicles, computers, or major household appliances, while a significant portion of the middle class in Country Y did not have sufficient income to purchase such items.

Which of the following, if true, most helps explain the discrepancy in the relationships described by the economist?

A. There are many consumer goods, such as household appliances, that are produced in Country X to be sold in the Country Y market.
B. The volume of trade between Country X and Country Y is increasing rapidly in both directions.
C. The economy of Country Y is recovering from a downturn that affected both Country Y and Country X.
D. Country X residents pay much less than their Country Y counterparts for housing, transportation, and child care.
E. In Country Y as well as in Country X, there are few assembly-line jobs in factories that pay a middle-class wage.

D

Source: Official Guide 2020
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

The comparison is between X, where there is less money paid for goods but the middle class has enough income to pay for the goods, and Y, where more money is paid but the middle class's income is insufficient. Instead of trying to guess a reason (as we have no information on surrounding circumstances), we'll look directly to the answer choices. This is an Alternative approach.

A. this does not explain the relation of income to money paid for goods
B. similarly to (A), this is irrelevant to the argument
C. this could imply that Y is in better shape, but we are told that X is in better shape
D. This directly explains why X residents have sufficient income to buy things. Good choice, let's keep going.
E. again, this does not give a separation between the two countries.
Join the discussion

Its pretty awesome and I love this.
Join the discussion