BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

economic recession

Expert replies
by clock60 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:50 am
hi guys
i have no idea how to solve this
can somebody share your thoughts

An economic recession can result from a lowering of employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and starts a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.

a lowering of employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, which causes people to cut consumer spending and start a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.

a lowering of employment rates triggered by dropping investment, which cause people to cut consumer spending and starts a cycle of layoffs leading back to even lower employment rates.

falling employment rates triggered by a drop in investment, causing cutbacks in consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs that lead to even lower employment rates.

falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, causing people to cut consumer spending and starting a cycle of layoffs that lead back to even lower employment rates.

falling employment rates that are triggered by a drop in investment, that cause cutbacks in consumer spending and the start of a cycle of layoffs leading to even lower employment rates.



Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:31 am
IMo D

I approached this way:
A. investment, which [which can refer only to investment]
B. investment, which [which can refer only to investment]
C. a drop in investment, causing [causing can refer to complete action in previous clause]
D. a drop in investment, causing [causing can refer to complete action in previous clause]

E. a drop in investment, that cause

, that is almost always wrong - E out.
Investment is not cauising people to cut spending
Drop in investment is causing people to cut spending.
A, B are out.

Out of C and D, D uses "that" to introduce a relative clause correctly.

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:40 am
kvcpk wrote:IMo D

I approached this way:
A. investment, which [which can refer only to investment]
B. investment, which [which can refer only to investment]
C. a drop in investment, causing [causing can refer to complete action in previous clause]
D. a drop in investment, causing [causing can refer to complete action in previous clause]

E. a drop in investment, that cause

, that is almost always wrong - E out.
Investment is not cauising people to cut spending
Drop in investment is causing people to cut spending.
A, B are out.

Out of C and D, D uses "that" to introduce a relative clause correctly.

Hope this helps!!
friend you approach is a good one but you ans is wrong the same as mine. it is not D
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:44 am
clock60 wrote:
kvcpk wrote:IMo D

I approached this way:
A. investment, which [which can refer only to investment]
B. investment, which [which can refer only to investment]
C. a drop in investment, causing [causing can refer to complete action in previous clause]
D. a drop in investment, causing [causing can refer to complete action in previous clause]

E. a drop in investment, that cause

, that is almost always wrong - E out.
Investment is not cauising people to cut spending
Drop in investment is causing people to cut spending.
A, B are out.

Out of C and D, D uses "that" to introduce a relative clause correctly.

Hope this helps!!
friend you approach is a good one but you ans is wrong the same as mine. it is not D
Something wrong with me today.. I would have definitely chosen D. :(
Whats the OA BTW?? C?
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:46 am
IMO C

economic recession causing people to cut cosnumer spending and .........

causing correct modifies economic recession.

In option D which incorrectly modifies investment as the cause.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:47 am
yes it is C, and i have no yet clear picture how to conqure it
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:51 am
selango wrote:IMO C

economic recession causing people to cut cosnumer spending and .........

causing correct modifies economic recession.

In option D which incorrectly modifies investment as the cause.
I do not see "where" in option D.
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:59 am
Praveen,

Look at the word which after comma.It incorrectly modifies investment.

If comma is followed by which it modifies immediately preceding noun.But here causing must modify economic recession not investment.So which must be eliminated.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by suryapal » Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:05 am
still not getting.... why its C over D ??
When the whole world seems to be against me and anything I touch becomes poisoned, when people think of giving up as the best solution, for me, giving up is the hardest..... :)
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:24 am
selango wrote:Praveen,

Look at the word which after comma.It incorrectly modifies investment.

If comma is followed by which it modifies immediately preceding noun.But here causing must modify economic recession not investment.So which must be eliminated.
I think you are talking about A or B option.
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:51 am
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:51 pm
Received a PM asking me to respond. This is an MGMAT question; when posting in future, please include the source in your original post.

Between C and D:

C: "rates triggered by a drop in investment" vs. D: "rates that are triggered by a drop in investment"

Both are fine. D is a bit more wordy, but still grammatically correct. I don't like to decide just based on wordiness unless I have to, so now I'd check the other differences.

C: "causing cutbacks in consumer spending" vs. D: "causing people to cut consumer spending"

Both are technically fine, again, though I don't like how D mentions people and consumers. Something can cause people to cut their spending or something can cause consumers to cut their spending. You wouldn't say something causes consumers to cut consumer spending.

C: "a cycle of layoffs that lead to even lower" vs. "a cycle of layoffs that lead back to even lower"

If something is a cycle, then by definition it leads back or loops around or returns to the starting point or however you want to phrase it. Using "cycle" and "lead back" is redundant.

In sum, there's nothing wrong with C. D is wordy and redundant. I think fewer official questions nowadays rely only on wordiness and redundancy, though, so this isn't really one to worry about.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1