BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ecological problems

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times
by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 12:24 am
The solution to any environmental problem that is not the result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing. As a result, few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solutions are made economically enticing.

The conclusion drawn in the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Few serious ecological problems are the result of government mismanagement.
(B) No environmental problems that stem from government mismanagement have solutions that are economically feasible.
(C) Major changes in consumer habits can be made economically enticing.
(D) Most environmental problems that are not the result of government mismanagement are major ecological problems.
(E) Few serious ecological problems can be solved by major changes in consumer habits
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Thu May 28, 2009 3:28 am
i like A


A. non govt environmental mismgmt can be solved only by major changes in consumer habits. if some serious ecological problems can be solved without major changes in consumer habits, they must not be non-govt mismanagment=>govt mismanagement

B. economic feasibility is out of scope

C. doesnt affect the argument

D. out of scope

E. we do not know if a lot/few can be solved by major changes in consumer habits
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 3:42 am
scoobydooby wrote:i like A
A. non govt environmental mismgmt can be solved only by major changes in consumer habits. if some serious ecological problems can be solved without major changes in consumer habits, they must not be non-govt mismanagment=>govt mismanagement
B. economic feasibility is out of scope
C. doesnt affect the argument
D. out of scope
E. we do not know if a lot/few can be solved by major changes in consumer habits
At last!! An answer accompanied by a full explanation. Thanks. Any other bets? I'll disclose the OA a bit later.

.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Thu May 28, 2009 4:05 am
:D .. let me also try with explanation...

IMO C


author argues that "result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing."

ONLY lie in changes ... changes can ONLY happen
wat if major changes in habits cannot be made enticing...?? the argument will fall apart...

hope it helps
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:44 am

by pratyush.mathur » Thu May 28, 2009 4:17 am
I feel D is correct...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 4:25 am
pratyush.mathur wrote:I feel D is correct...
why??

.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
GMAT Score:710

Re: Ecological problems

by rahulg83 » Thu May 28, 2009 5:28 am
avenus wrote:The solution to any environmental problem that is not the result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing. As a result, few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solutions are made economically enticing.

The conclusion drawn in the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Few serious ecological problems are the result of government mismanagement.
(B) No environmental problems that stem from government mismanagement have solutions that are economically feasible.
(C) Major changes in consumer habits can be made economically enticing.
(D) Most environmental problems that are not the result of government mismanagement are major ecological problems.
(E) Few serious ecological problems can be solved by major changes in consumer habits
Thanks for posting few nice questions avenus
I too feel D is correct. Conclusion says that few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solutions are made economically enticing. That means most of the serious ecological problems will not be solved. And the premise says that solution to any env problem that is not the result of governmnet management is blah blah blah..so what kind of problems are we talking about? The problems which are not caused by government management, and these are the serious ecological problems which can be solved if consumer changes are economically enticing.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Thu May 28, 2009 5:41 am
IMO, [spoiler]it's between C and D. But in the end, I think C would prevail.

A) is not implied anywhere.
B) is extreme and not implied.
D) The word 'most' throws me off here.
E) This goes against the conclusion and stated premises, so there's no way that this answer is right.[/spoiler]
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Fri May 29, 2009 8:29 am
scoobydooby wrote:i like A
A. non govt environmental mismgmt can be solved only by major changes in consumer habits. if some serious ecological problems can be solved without major changes in consumer habits, they must not be non-govt mismanagment=>govt mismanagement
B. economic feasibility is out of scope
C. doesnt affect the argument
D. out of scope
E. we do not know if a lot/few can be solved by major changes in consumer habits
well done. OA is A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:58 pm
choice A should be the correct choice
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1