BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Easy way to sort through DS problems logically

Expert replies
by GaStateMTAX » Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:51 am
Hi everyone,

For those of you having trouble getting lost in the DS problems I noticed something the other day while solving them that helps immensely.

I noticed that you can split DS problems into a AD/BCE type split.

For example:

How much did a telephone call cost?

1. The call lasted for 53 minutes
2. The cost for the first 3 minutes was 5 times the cost for each additional minute.

So, start by writing this down on your sheet of paper (or on test day your dry erase):

AD/BCE
1.
2.

First, think about what you need: you'll need the cost per minute, how long the call was or maybe the total cost of the call.

Next, look at number 1. It gives you the length of the call. Great. But it doesn't help us here because we don't know the cost per minute. So on your handy little split chart put an "X" next to number 1 and cross out A and D. Like this:

XX/BCE
1.X
2.

Now check number 2. Nope it doesn't help us. It gives a little more information but without the cost for the first 3 minutes or the cost for each additional minute we can't solve anything. Cross out B.

XX/XCE
1.X
2.X

Now test "C". Neither 1 or 2 satisfy the sufficiency test because neither give us a cost. Cross out C.

The answer is therefore E.

Rather than "solving" each problem, you essentially just eliminate until there is only one possibility. This also saves me a lot of time, I can pop them off like popcorn now! I just thought I share with you all this helps me compartmentalize DS problems and helps me focus a little better. Especially since I am a graph person.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

thanks MTAX

by ccrocnyc » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:32 pm
extremely helpful strategy. Thank you.
Last edited by ccrocnyc on Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." -Nelson Mandela
Join the discussion

by BrianSmith » Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:13 am
Another tip:

If you don't know exactly what you need, try to go the other way: try to find two possible different answers to prove the statement insufficient. (It's only sufficient if it gets you a single clear answer)

Remember, you don't actually need to know the answer in DS, only if the statements are enough.
Join the discussion