Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Each year

Expert replies
by madhur_ahuja » Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:55 pm
Each year, an official estimate of the stock of cod in the Grand Banks is announced. This estimate is obtained by averaging two separate estimates of how many cod are available, one based on the number of cod caught by research vessels during a once-yearly sampling of the area and the other on the average number of tons of cod caught by various commercial vessels per unit of fishing effort expended there in the past year—a unit of fishing effort being one kilometer of net set out in the water for one hour. In previous decades, the two estimates usually agreed closely. However, for the last decade the estimate based on commercial tonnage has been increasing markedly, by about the same amount as the sampling-based estimate has been decreasing.

If the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following is most strongly supported by them?

(A) Last year’s official estimate was probably not much different from the official estimate ten years ago.

(B) The number of commercial vessels fishing for cod in the Grand Banks has increased substantially over the past decade.

(C) The sampling-based estimate is more accurate than the estimate based on commercial tonnage in that the data on which it relies is less likely to be inaccurate.

(D) The once-yearly sampling by research vessels should be used as the sole basis for arriving at the official estimate of the stock of cod.

(E) Twenty years ago, the overall stock of cod in the Grand Banks was officially estimated to be much larger than it is estimated to be today
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ankit1383 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:07 pm
IMO....A
It took me 4 minutes......:(

Lets take an example last decade official estimate was 100(assuming that 100 is both for sampling and commercial method,so average is 100)

this year commercial method is 120
so sampling method will be 100-20=80 since question says increase in commercial is same as decrease in sampling method....
Due to this their average remains the same...as for past decade which is same as option A

Hope i am not missing something here
Join the discussion

by Svedankae » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:20 pm
tough one... but i would have picked A as well..
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:25 pm
ankit1383 wrote:IMO....A
It took me 4 minutes......:(

Lets take an example last decade official estimate was 100(assuming that 100 is both for sampling and commercial method,so average is 100)

this year commercial method is 120
so sampling method will be 100-20=80 since question says increase in commercial is same as decrease in sampling method....
Due to this their average remains the same...as for past decade which is same as option A

Hope i am not missing something here
Nicely explained. OA is A
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:26 pm
OMG I can't believe it: I misread A (instead of "official" I understood the "research vessel" measurement) and was about to write like a ton of explanations as to why there's no correct answer...

But anyway, it's A and the reason for that is highlighted:

Each year, an official estimate of the stock of cod in the Grand Banks is announced. This estimate is obtained by averaging two separate estimates of how many cod are available, one based on the number of cod caught by research vessels during a once-yearly sampling of the area and the other on the average number of tons of cod caught by various commercial vessels per unit of fishing effort expended there in the past year—a unit of fishing effort being one kilometer of net set out in the water for one hour. In previous decades, the two estimates usually agreed closely. However, for the last decade the estimate based on commercial tonnage has been increasing markedly, by about the same amount as the sampling-based estimate has been decreasing.

It's an average of two separate things, of which one is declining by the same amount as the other is increasing.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:17 pm
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion