BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Each of the fallen soldiers

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 45 times
by sameerballani » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:13 am
Each of the fallen soldiers - Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - were hard workers, very different from the soldiers that remained to guard the hospital.

A. Each of the fallen soldiers - Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - were hard workers
B. Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers
C. The fallen soldiers - Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - were all hard workers

[spoiler]OA:Later[/spoiler]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:30 am
C for me
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:23 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times

by ov25 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:44 am
C, by all means for clarity purposes
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:58 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 2 times

by divya23 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:05 am
imo c
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 amFollowed by: 365 members
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:23 am
When we see two dashes in a sentence like this, we can think of the information between them as an appositive phrase and mentally eliminate it. The rest of the sentence must make sense. Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement.

"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.

This is another similar question:

Each of Hemingway's wives - Hadley Richardson. Pauline Pfeiffer. Martha Gelhom. and Mary Welsh - were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.

(A) Each of Hemingway's wives - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh - were strong and interesting women,

(B) Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - each of them Hemingway's wives - were strong and, interesting women,

(C) Hemingway's wives - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - were all strong and interesting women,

(D) Strong and interesting women - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - each a wife of Hemingway, was

(E) Strong and interesting women - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - every one of Hemingway's wives were

OA: C
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 45 times

by sameerballani » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:52 am
VivianKerr wrote:When we see two dashes in a sentence like this, we can think of the information between them as an appositive phrase and mentally eliminate it. The rest of the sentence must make sense. Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement.

"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.

Why B is eliminated?
If we remove what is mentioned in between the dashes, we get -

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Don't we have plural subject here? Please guide.
Also, don't you think there should be a comma before Bob

Thanks

Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 amFollowed by: 49 members
Thanked: 77 times

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:10 am
Hi vivian,

i have a confusion in your reasoning for Op B, please clear.
"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.
for Op A its okay but in Op B

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Here i think the subject is "Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay" and correctly associated with plural verb "were"...moreover i think, the part in between "-" is a modifier...there may be some other reason to eliminate Op B or m applying wrong concept here???
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 amFollowed by: 53 members
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:31 am
atulmangal wrote:Hi vivian,

i have a confusion in your reasoning for Op B, please clear.
"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.
for Op A its okay but in Op B

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Here i think the subject is "Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay" and correctly associated with plural verb "were"...moreover i think, the part in between "-" is a modifier...there may be some other reason to eliminate Op B or m applying wrong concept here???
Hi,
Good point.
B would be correct if we change it as follows:
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them a fallen soldier - were hard workers.
(or)
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - all of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers
I believe that was the mistake in B.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 amFollowed by: 49 members
Thanked: 77 times

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:44 am
Frankenstein wrote:
atulmangal wrote:Hi vivian,

i have a confusion in your reasoning for Op B, please clear.
"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.
for Op A its okay but in Op B

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Here i think the subject is "Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay" and correctly associated with plural verb "were"...moreover i think, the part in between "-" is a modifier...there may be some other reason to eliminate Op B or m applying wrong concept here???
Hi,
Good point.
B would be correct if we change it as follows:
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them a fallen soldier - were hard workers.
(or)
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - all of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers
I believe that was the mistake in B.
100% correct, this is the reasoning i was expecting...the original official question which Vivian posted is from OG-10, and i remember Og gives the same explanation why Op B is incorrect. Great!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1