BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

During their years

Expert replies
by sameerballani » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:30 am
During their years on the frontier, they had numerous pitched battles against Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe, the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.


A. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.

B. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the possibly most skillful enemy in frontier history.

C. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the most skillful enemy, possibly, in frontier history.

D. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly a most skillful enemy in frontier history.

E. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the more skillful enemy in frontier history.

[spoiler]OA:Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by abhishek.pati » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:36 am
During their years on the frontier, they had numerous pitched battles against Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe, the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.


A. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history. correct

B. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the possibly most skillful enemy in frontier history. wrong usage

C. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the most skillful enemy, possibly, in frontier history. wrong usage , makes no sense.

D. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly a most skillful enemy in frontier history. wrong usage

E. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the more skillful enemy in frontier history. wrong usage.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:28 am
I found this question is testing our knowledge on articles.

Please use 'the' infront of suprelative or unique entities.

Some guys fought many battles even with X who is the most fierce of all.

+1 for abhishek
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by divya23 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:01 am
imo a
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:15 am
IMO: A

You would never said "the possibly".

We also use the article "the" before "more" and "most."

Since it's talking about one enemy compared to ALL other enemies, we would use the superlative.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:31 am
Hi Vivian,

I agree with the OA but can you please help me understand the structure of this sentence.

Op A

During their years on the frontier, they had numerous pitched battles against Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe, the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.

Here my confusion is, if the battle is against these four elements only "Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches" then i believe AND is necessary between the final two elements (Kiowas AND Comanches) here which is missing.

on the other hand, if the battle is between five elements "Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe" then what is the meaning of (- AND)..i'm not able to understand this combination of (hyphen AND)

Please explain!!!
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:46 am
Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:52 am
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Hi, actually i rarely saw any hyphen used in SC question so far, most of the time i encountered DASH only and even for this question i initially thought it was DASH but DASH is slightly longer in size, second so far what i know about DASH is,

1) Part between two DASH is modifier
2) DASH MODIFIER COMMA

in this question, in Op A, the construction is same a second one which means AND etc etc is a modifier...that means the sentence will become structurally wrong....my doubt was is the structure of the sentence is correct or not?????
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:10 am
atulmangal wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Hi, actually i rarely saw any hyphen used in SC question so far, most of the time i encountered DASH only and even for this question i initially thought it was DASH but DASH is slightly longer in size, second so far what i know about DASH is,

1) Part between two DASH is modifier
2) DASH MODIFIER COMMA

in this question, in Op A, the construction is same a second one which means AND etc etc is a modifier...that means the sentence will become structurally wrong....my doubt was is the structure of the sentence is correct or not?????
Hi,
I understand your point. hyphen is only used in compound words, to make the whole bunch mean as a single word.
Coming to dash, in this case :
IMO, It is used here as a substitute of comma only because adding one more comma to the already plenty commas in the same sentence makes this sentence very awkward and ambiguous too. So, the meaning of the sentence as as you interpreted in the second like five elements.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:09 pm
Frankenstein wrote:
atulmangal wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Hi, actually i rarely saw any hyphen used in SC question so far, most of the time i encountered DASH only and even for this question i initially thought it was DASH but DASH is slightly longer in size, second so far what i know about DASH is,

1) Part between two DASH is modifier
2) DASH MODIFIER COMMA

in this question, in Op A, the construction is same a second one which means AND etc etc is a modifier...that means the sentence will become structurally wrong....my doubt was is the structure of the sentence is correct or not?????
Hi,
I understand your point. hyphen is only used in compound words, to make the whole bunch mean as a single word.
Coming to dash, in this case :
IMO, It is used here as a substitute of comma only because adding one more comma to the already plenty commas in the same sentence makes this sentence very awkward and ambiguous too. So, the meaning of the sentence as as you interpreted in the second like five elements.
ohh!!! i looked again and now i got the structure plus your point. My understanding is, here DASH is actually acting as a comma only as u said and the structure is same as

A, B, C, D, and E ----> usual structure

Here, COMMA before and is replaced with DASH in the original question.

Thanks, its always good to discuss conceptual things with you brother.
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:01 pm
atulmangal wrote: ohh!!! i looked again and now i got the structure plus your point. My understanding is, here DASH is actually acting as a comma only as u said and the structure is same as

A, B, C, D, and E ----> usual structure

Here, COMMA before and is replaced with DASH in the original question.

Thanks, its always good to discuss conceptual things with you brother.
Hi,
Good to know that you are convinced :)
Your queries stimulate the thought process of others. Keep up the good work!
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1