BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:54 am
Theater M has 25 rows with 27 seats in each row. How many of the seats were occupied during a
certain show?
(1) During the show, there was an average (arithmetic mean) of 10 unoccupied
seats per row for the front 20 rows.
(2) During the show, there was an average (arithmetic mean) of 20 unoccupied seats per
row for the back 15 rows.

OA: E
How? If we take statement 1 then 10*20 seats are unoccupied. therefore rest all are occupied.
Now how we come to know that in the rest of the rows there is no empty seat.
Also we can assume that there are no unoccupied seats in the other rows if we consider statement 1.

Please help to understand the ambiguity..
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by scoobydooby » Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:23 am
we need to find occupied seats for the rows 1 to 25

stmnt 1 gives data for unoccupied seats for rows 1 to 20, so we can find occupied seats for rows 1 to 20 only. we have no info about rows 21 to 25.
not sufficient

stmnt 2 gives data for unoccupied seats for rows 10 to 25, so we can find occupied seats for rows 10 to 25 only. we have no info about rows 1 to 9
not sufficient

combining, we have info on occupied seats between rows 1 to 20 and rows 10 to 25. no info about rows 1 to 9.
not sufficient

hence E
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:05 am
thanks for your reply. but
what if i consider that no seat is unoccupied in rows from 21 to 25.
Similarly i can consider for the 2nd statement.
please explain why i cannot consider the above stated things for this ques.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:52 am
statement 1: we are given info only on rows 1 to 20 in statement. nothing is mentioned about 21 to 25. so we cant assume anything about rows 21 to 25. we need to strictly go by whatever information has been given

likewise for statement 2
Join the discussion