BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ds

Expert replies
by vaivish » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:06 am
attached problem..i want to know why do we need both the statements to ans the Q. I think A is fine as the ratio is increasing numerator has to increase right? please help.
Attachments
ps.doc
(72 KiB) Downloaded 115 times
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sudhir3127 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:33 am
My answer is C as well

i think we need both the statements

statemnt 1. Ratio of shares of stock to total number of shars + bonds increased...

this will not lead us anywhere

assume we have 500 shares and 500 bonds

the ratio number of shares/ total = 1:2

but what if the bonds in his portfolio has come come down to 250 from 500

then the ratio is 500/750 which is 2:3 but the number of shares hasnt increased..

that the reason we require statement 2.

hope its clear...
Join the discussion

by vaivish » Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:39 am
hey thanks...its clear now.
Join the discussion