Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

DS - sweaters

Expert replies
by Xbond » Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:40 am
Hi there,

Could you explain the concept of this DS in simplest way

During a sale, a clothing store sold each shirt at a price of $15 and each sweater at a price of $25.
Did the store sell more sweaters than shirts during the sale?

(1) The average (arithmetic mean) of the prices of all of the shirts and sweaters that the store
sold during the sales was$21.
(2) The total price of all of the shirts and sweaters that the store sold during the sale was $420.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by iamjakekim » Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:00 am
set up equation.

Q asks you whether # Sweater > # Shirts.

W--#of sweater
T--#of Sgirts

stm1.

25W + 15T = 21 (W + T) SUF

stm2.

Not Suf
Join the discussion

by Xbond » Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:31 am
many thks
Join the discussion

by arbiter » Sun Aug 23, 2009 5:05 am
25W + 15T = 21 (W + T)

are we gonna apply hit and trial method here to get W and T value?
arbiter
Join the discussion

by shanrizvi » Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:24 pm
I have come up with a very easy way to do questions like these.

Basically, remember this as a rule: if you have the arithmetic means for X, Y and X&Y, you can a) know which of them has a higher weight, and b) their ratio. Plot the averages on a number line.

---X----(X&Y)---------Y

Basically, if (X+Y) is closer to X, X has a greater weight.

The ratio X:Y is Y-(X&Y):X-(X&Y)
[NOTE: The values are averages]
Join the discussion

by pradeepsarathy » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:24 pm
IMO D -

Stmt 1 -
Let number of shirts be X and and number of sweaters be Y

therefore, (15x + 25y)/(x+y) = 21
=>15x + 25y = 21x + 21y
=>4y = 6x
=>x/y = 4/6
=>x/y = 2/3

from the above eqn, we can clearly determine that y is greater than x.
Stmt 1 alone is sufficient.

Stmt 2 - is satisfied for the values 15 * 8 + 25 * 12

Hence both the stmts are individually sufficient.
Join the discussion

by wonderland130 » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:13 am
No statement 2 is not sufficient. While 8 shirts and 12 sweaters works so does 13 shirts and 9 sweaters. You can find many values for shirts that leaves a multiple of 25 for sweaters and if you look at those number half sell more sweaters half sell more shirts so 2 is inconclusive. answer is A
Join the discussion

by pradeepsarathy » Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:34 am
Agree....my bad...i inferred the stmt 2 from the result obtained from stmt 1(2:3).

I change my IMO - A
Join the discussion