BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS: Rectangle

Expert replies
by amitmj » Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:43 am
The surface area of a rectangular field was changed so that the length of one
of the dimensions was reduced by 10 feet and the length of the other dimension
was increased by 20 feet. What was the surface area before these changes
were made?
(1) After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
(2) The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:09 am
amitmj wrote:The surface area of a rectangular field was changed so that the length of one
of the dimensions was reduced by 10 feet and the length of the other dimension
was increased by 20 feet. What was the surface area before these changes
were made?
(1) After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
(2) The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Statement 1: After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
Test one case that also satisfies statement 2.
Case 1: After the changes, L=50 and W=50, so that LW = 50*50 = 2500
Since one dimension was reduced by 10 feet (from 60 to 50), while the other dimension was increased by 20 feet (from 30 to 50), the original surface area = 60*30 = 1800.

Test one case that DOESN'T also satisfy statement 2.
Case 1: After the changes, L=25 and W=100, so that LW = 25*100 = 2500
If the length was reduced by 10 feet (from 35 to 25), while the width was increased by 20 feet (from 80 to 100), the original surface area = 35*80 = 2800.

Since the original surface area can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Case 1 also satisfies statement 2.
In this case, the original surface area = 1800.

Case 3: After the changes, L=40 and W=40
Since one dimension was reduced by 10 feet (from 50 to 40), while the other dimension was increased by 20 feet (from 20 to 40), the original surface area = 50*20 = 1000.

Since the original surface area can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Both statements are satisfied only by Case 1, implying that the original surface area = 1800.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:38 am
amitmj wrote:The surface area of a rectangular field was changed so that the length of one of the dimensions was reduced by 10 feet and the length of the other dimension was increased by 20 feet. What was the surface area before these changes were made?

(1) After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
(2) The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Target question: What was the surface area before the changes were made?

Let L = original length of the rectangular field
Let W = original width
So, the original AREA = LW

REPHRASED target question: What is the value of LW?

Statement 1: After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
After the changes, the NEW length = L - 10 and the NEW width = W + 20
So, we get (L - 10)(W + 20) = 2500
Expand to get LW + 20L - 10W - 200 = 2500
Is this enough information to determine the value of LW? No.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made.
In other words, L - 10 = W + 20
Is this enough information to determine the value of LW? No.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that (L - 10)(W + 20) = 2500
Statement 2 tells us that L - 10 = W + 20
If (L - 10) and (W + 20) are EQUAL (from statement 2) and (L - 10)(W + 20) = 2500 (from statement 1), then (L - 10) and (W + 20) must both equal 50
If L - 10 = 50, then L = 60
If W + 20 = 50, then W = 30
So, LW = (60)(30) = 1800
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by masoom j negi » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:38 am
Statement 1. After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
Statement 1 gives (l - 10)(b + 20) = 2500. Hence, Insufficient.
Statement 2. The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made.
Statement 2 gives l - 10 = b + 20
l = b + 30. Hence, Insufficient.
Statement 1 & 2 together. ( l -10)(b + 20) = 2500 & l = b + 30.
(b + 30 - 10)(b + 20) = 2500 = (b + 20)2 .
So, b+ 20 = 50 i.e. b = 30 and l = 60. Hence, sufficient.
Hence, c is the answer.
Join the discussion