Is x = y ?
(1) x/y = 3
(2) x = 3y
Source:Nova Data Prep
OA later
(1) x/y = 3
(2) x = 3y
Source:Nova Data Prep
OA later
GMAT score is equally counted as your GPA and 78 clicks can change you life.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

with Chris Peckover

with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
Brilliantlimestone wrote:Hi,
1. x/y = 3 means x = 3y, you may see that x can not be equal to y while x = 3y. However, watch out!
If both x and y are Zero, then x = y = 3y
Insuf.
2. Same as 1. As x = 3y means x/y = 3
Insuf.
1&2. As 2 is the same to 1, 2 does not provide any additional information. Then 1 & 2 : insuf.
My answer E. Both 1 & 2 together are insuf.
IMO A.frank1 wrote:Is x = y ?
(1) x/y = 3
(2) x = 3y
Source:Nova Data Prep
OA later
Thanks for your suggestionselango wrote:Yes this is not a good question.
Frank always use authentic materials.
Now my question is CANNOT BE that statement 2 converted to Statement 1 using cross multipication ....that is where i am confused...x/y equals 3 indicates the following two points:
1) x is not equal to 0, because then x/y would
equal 0, not 3
and
2) y is not equal to 0, because then x/y would
be an undefined infinite value and not 0.
Hence, x - y ≠0 or x ≠y. The statement is
sufficient.
frank1 wrote:Thanks for your suggestionselango wrote:Yes this is not a good question.
Frank always use authentic materials.
I normally donot use Nova's materials but
I think Nova is not bad publication when it comes to GMAT.
At least in this case.I consider this because this question is from DS book(The whole book is on DS....which i have not found with other publications..) and most questions seems like they are as per gmat standards.
This question is bit tricky.....even i dont agree with OA....thats why i have posted it here for comments....
I agree it is not good question......but i think it is not that bad either(out of gmat scope)
OA is A...Now my question is CANNOT BE that statement 2 converted to Statement 1 using cross multipication ....that is where i am confused...x/y equals 3 indicates the following two points:
1) x is not equal to 0, because then x/y would
equal 0, not 3
and
2) y is not equal to 0, because then x/y would
be an undefined infinite value and not 0.
Hence, x - y ≠0 or x ≠y. The statement is
sufficient.
Answer should be D.Viktri wrote:I and II are the same statement (cross multiplication as you mentioned) so the answer can only be D or E; the OA is incorrect.
Is x = y ?
(1) x/y = 3
(2) x = 3y
Statement (1): x/y = 3
x/y equals 3 indicates the following two points:
1) x is not equal to 0, because then x/y would
equal 0, not 3
and
2) y is not equal to 0, because then x/y would
be an undefined infinite value and not 0.
So, cross-multiplying the equation (valid because
we know the denominator y ≠0) yields x = 3y.
Subtracting y from both sides yields x - y = 2y.
Since y is not equal to 0, 2y is not equal to zero.
Hence, x - y ≠0 or x ≠y. The statement is
sufficient.
Statement (2): x = 3y
If x = y = 0, x = 3y and still x = y is true.
But if x ≠0, since x = 3y, x would not equal y just
as in Statement (1).
We have a double case, and therefore the statement
is not sufficient.
The answer is (A).
New here Create free account