BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS question

Expert replies
by magical cook » Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:57 am
Hi,

I am hoping that anyone could explaing this question in an easy way...

Dose the integer K has a factor p such that 1<p<K?

1) K>4!
2) 13!+2<k<13!+13

The answer is B but I only was able to understand A k>24 would not be sufficient to answer the question but I have no idea as to 2).

Thanks!
R.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitamit2020 » Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:02 am
Good question.

The question askes - if we can find an number which is lesser than k and can devide k without remainder.

Let us examine statement (2), it says that k belongs to [13!+2, 13!+13].
take k = 13! + 2 -- we are now to find a number (les than k) which can devide this without remainder clearly p = 2 can do that.

go to k = 13! + 3 -- it is clear that p = 3 can answer the question.

... similarly till 13! + 13 ... p = 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and 13 can devide k without remainder and obviously it will be lesser than 13! + any positive integer.

hope it helps...
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:13 pm
Amit is right about this process of examining statement 2. I just want to take one step back and look at the question itself b/c there's a very easy way to rephrase it. This is basically asking us whether k is prime.

A prime number has exactly two factors: itself and 1. By definition, it cannot have a factor p that is between itself and 1. A non-prime number, on the other hand, that is greater than 1 will have a factor between itself and 1 (again, by definition).

So I can answer this question if I know whether k is prime.

(1) just tells me that k>24. There are prime numbers and non-prime numbers greater than 24, so that's not useful.

(2) for any sum, if the two numbers in that sum have a common factor, that factor will also be a factor of the sum. E.g., 2 + 4 = 6. 2 is a factor of 2 and 2 is a factor of 4. Therefore, 2 will also be a factor of 6.

Now, to follow amit's logic:
13! + 2 = 13*12*11*10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2 + 2. 2 is a factor of both of the numbers, so the sum will also have 2 as a factor. Therefore, the first possibility is not prime. Follow this logic all the way through 13! + 13; you will always have at least one factor, so that number is not prime. All of the possibilities given by statement 2 are not prime so I can answer the question: No, the integer k does not have a factor p such that 1<p<k.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion