Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

DS question

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sathishkumarjva9888 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:55 am
To me, Answer should be E.

(1) xy > 1

Assume x=2 & y=3, xy = 6 >1. But x/y <1.
If x=3 & y=2, xy =6>1 and x/y >1. So, A is NOT SUFFICIENT.


(2) x - y > 0

Lets say x= 3, y =2. 3-2=1 > 0. x/y >1
When x=-2 & y = -3, x-y = 1 >0. But x/y <1. NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining together does not help rather. So, both are NOT SUFFICIENT and answer is E.
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:08 am
nh_cryptic wrote:If x and y are integers, is x/y greater than 1 ?

(1) xy > 1
(2) x – y > 0
Is x/y > 1?

(1) xy > 1
If x = 4, y = 2, xy = 8 > 1. Here x/y = 4/2 = 2 > 1
If x = -2, y = -4, xy = 8 > 1. Here x/y = -2/-4 = 1/2 < 1
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) x - y > 0 or x > y
If x = 4, y = 2, then x - y = 4 - 2 = 2 > 0. Here x/y = 4/2 = 2 > 1
If x = -2, y = -4, then x - y = -2 - (-4) = 4 - 2 = 2 > 0. Here x/y = -2/-4 = 1/2 < 1.
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we take the same examples as in statements 1 and 2 above. No additional info; NOT sufficient.

The correct answer is E.

In case the question would have been: If x and y are positive integers, is x/y greater than 1 ?

(1) xy > 1
(2) x – y > 0

Then the answer would have been B, because then we know that x and y are positive and so the question is: Is x > y?

Statement 2 clearly implies that x > y and hence it's sufficient.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by transfer9858 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:40 pm
If you just re- word the equation its saying " is x>y?

Statement one is not sufficient because those numbers could be anything.

Statement two says x>y, hence sufficient.
Join the discussion

by nh_cryptic » Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:52 pm
let show my calculation

in question it say X/Y>1 so it must be X>Y or we can proof it from both st.

now in st 1 we can not find wether X>Y because X & Y can take different sing so it out

but in st 2 as X-Y>0 it must be X>y
in other way
let X=-3 & Y=-1
we get X-Y=-3-(-1)=-3+1=-3 so it can not satisfy X-Y>0 to satisfy X-y>o X must hold greater value in what ever sing
let X=3 y=1 so X-y=2>o so we find x>y
in others way
let X=-1 & y=-3
so X-y=-1-(-3)=-1+3=2>0
so in number line we can get -1 is greater than -3 so X>y

now let x=1 y=3
so x-y=1-3=-2<0 so no way
in my think to satisfy x-Y>o , X must by greater than Y so obly b is enough
Join the discussion

by aneesh.kg » Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:01 pm
x/y > 1 does not necessarily mean that x > y.
This is a very common mistake.

If x/y > 1, and 'y' is a positive integer, ONLY THEN can we multiply both sides of the inequality with 'y' and the sign of inequality will not change.
Thus,
x > y

If 'y' is a negative integer, when we multiply both sides of the inequality 'y' the sign of inequality WILL REVERSE. And, we will have
x < y

The problem does not mention anywhere that 'y' is positive, and thats why both the possibilities are to be considered.

You can see even plug in values to understand this:

x/y > 1 for say x = 3 and y = 2. (x > y when y > 0)
x/y > 1 also for x = - 3 and y = - 2. (x < y when y < 0)

So, what did we learn here?

An inequality behaves a little differently from an equation. We have to be careful while multiplying with a number on both sides of the inequation.
If the quantity being multiplied in postive, the sign of inequality WILL NOT CHANGE.
If the quantity being multiplies is negative, the sign of inequality WILL REVERSE.
Aneesh Bangia
GMAT Math Coach
[email protected]

GMATPad:
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/GMATPad
Join the discussion