BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS question: Instructor, can you please clear this doubt?

Expert replies
by jrikhraj » Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:45 am
What is the ratio of y to x?

(1) y = 3x

(2) x = 11

Can we divide the equation in (1) by x to get the ratio as 3 even if we are not explicitly given that x!=0?

The OA is A. However, I marked C since we were not given that x is !=0.

Instructor, please clear this doubt so that I don't get confused in such an easy problem again !
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:58 am
jrikhraj wrote:What is the ratio of y to x?

(1) y = 3x

(2) x = 11

Can we divide the equation in (1) by x to get the ratio as 3 even if we are not explicitly given that x!=0?

The OA is A. However, I marked C since we were not given that x is !=0.

Instructor, please clear this doubt so that I don't get confused in such an easy problem again !
If this were a real GMAT question, they would tell you in advance that x and y are positive. As you've presented the question, I suppose the right answer ought to be C, because, as you point out, x and y could be zero using statement 1 alone, in which case the ratio would be undefined. You'd never need to worry about an exception like that on a real GMAT question however.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Aman verma » Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:18 am
Yes , Ian has rightly pointed out that on the actual GMAT, the question will mention whether x & y are positive. And , even if we are not explicitly given x! = 0 , if we assume x!=0 , then from the first statement we get a ratio which becomes undefined. So, following Ian's logic , the answer IMOC.
800. Arjun's-Bird-Eye
Join the discussion

by jrikhraj » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:46 am
Thanks Ian and Aman

This was a question from one of Manhattan's practice GMAT tests so I assumed that it would be very similar to the real GMAT. Even I was very surprised to see that x>0 was not provided. Anyway, i would take it that my reasoning is correct.

Thanks for the quick reply !!
Join the discussion