BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Question # 1 - X^2 + Y^2?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:32 am
Statement 1: 2xy < 100
Implies xy < 50
Only from this we cannot determine whether (x² + y²) is greater than 100 or not.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: (x + y)² > 200
Implies (x + y)² - 200 > 0
=> (x + y + √200)(x + y - √200) > 0
This implies either of the following
  • 1. Both (x + y + √200) and (x + y - √200) are greater than zero. Combining the two conditions (x + y) > √200 => y > (-x + √200) => y² > (-x + √200)² = (x - √200)²

    2. Both (x + y + √200) and (x + y - √200) are less than zero. Combining these two conditions (x + y) < -√200 => => y < (-x - √200) => y² > (-x - √200)² = (x + √200)²
Again we can combine both of the above conditions as y² > (x ± √200)²
Therefore, (x² + y²) > (x ± √200)² + x²

(x ± √200)² + x² = (x² ± (2√200)x + 200) + x² = (2x² ± (2√200)x + 200) = 2(x² ± (√200)x + 100) = 2(x² ± (2√50)x + 50 + 50) = 2((x ± √50)² + 50)

Minimum value of the above expression is 100. Thus (x ± √200)² + x² ≥ 100
Thus, (x² + y²) > 100

Sufficient

The correct answer is B.
Last edited by Rahul@gurome on Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:35 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:Statement 1: 2xy < 100
Implies xy < 50
Only from this we cannot determine whether (x² + y²) is greater than 100 or not.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: (x + y)² > 200
Implies (x² + 2xy + y²) > 200
=> (x² + y²) > (200 - 2xy)
=> (x² + y²) > 2*(100 - xy)

Now whether (x² + y²) is greater than 100 or not depends upon the value of xy.
For example,
  • 1. If xy < 50 => 2*(100 - xy) > 2*(100 - 50) = 100 => (x² + y²) > 100
    2. If xy > 50 => 2*(100 - xy) < 2*(100 - 50) = 100 => (x² + y²) may or not be greater than 100
Not sufficient


1 & 2 Together: xy < 50
Thus (x² + y²) > 100

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.

As you have already proved that statement 2 is insufficient

Can you please provide some example values for X and Y which proves that statement 2 is insufficient.
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:53 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:Statement 1: 2xy < 100
Implies xy < 50
Only from this we cannot determine whether (x² + y²) is greater than 100 or not.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: (x + y)² > 200
Implies (x² + 2xy + y²) > 200
=> (x² + y²) > (200 - 2xy)
=> (x² + y²) > 2*(100 - xy)

Now whether (x² + y²) is greater than 100 or not depends upon the value of xy.
For example,
  • 1. If xy < 50 => 2*(100 - xy) > 2*(100 - 50) = 100 => (x² + y²) > 100
    2. If xy > 50 => 2*(100 - xy) < 2*(100 - 50) = 100 => (x² + y²) may or not be greater than 100
Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: xy < 50
Thus (x² + y²) > 100

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
I think option B should be sufficient
I tried with many values but couldn't find a single x,y pair where (x+y)^2>200 but x^2+y^2<100.
if (x+y)^2>200
then x+y>14 or x+y<-14
Take any x,y values & you will find that if (x+y)^2>200 then x^2+y^2 has to be greater than100

PLZ ADVISE IF I AM GOING WRONG ANYWHERE
Join the discussion

by sumit.sinha » Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:44 am
I think option B should be sufficient
I tried with many values but couldn't find a single x,y pair where (x+y)^2>200 but x^2+y^2<100.
if (x+y)^2>200
Attaboy..that is exactly what happened with me! :)[/quote]
Cheers,
Sumit
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:41 am
Sorry guys.
The analysis I posted earlier was wrong.
Statement 2 is sufficient indeed. I've edited the reply. But I must agree that it is complicated and time consuming.

Plugging number is always a safest technique for PS problems. But for DS (for this particular type of problems), you can never be sure. That's why I tend to avoid that technique for DS.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by ronaldramlan » Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:04 am
I truly hope that someone from Veritas can jump in and clarify this issue as the OA is C, and the explanation offered does not form a strong logical basis to claim that statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT.
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:01 am
Why is 2 sufficient ? Here is how easy it is :

For any two distinct numbers x and y : (x-y)^2 >= 0
=> x^2 + y^2 >= 2xy

So, statement 2 :

(x+y)^2 > 200
=> x^2+y^2+2xy > 200
=> 2(x^2+y^2) > 200
=> x^2 + y^2 > 100

So it is sufficient .

Hope that makes it clear.
Last edited by anshumishra on Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:30 am
anshumishra wrote:Why is 2 sufficient ? Here is how easy it is :

For any two distinct numbers x and y : (x-y)^2 > 0
=> x^2 + y^2 > 2xy

So, statement 2 :

(x+y)^2 > 200
=> x^2+y^2+2xy > 200 ( Where you 2xy gone in the nest step)

=> 2(x^2+y^2) > 200
=> x^2 + y^2 > 100

So it is sufficient .

Hope that makes it clear.
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:14 am
goyalsau wrote:
anshumishra wrote:Why is 2 sufficient ? Here is how easy it is :

For any two distinct numbers x and y : (x-y)^2 > 0
=> x^2 + y^2 > 2xy

So, statement 2 :

(x+y)^2 > 200
=> x^2+y^2+2xy > 200 ( Where you 2xy gone in the nest step)

=> 2(x^2+y^2) > 200
=> x^2 + y^2 > 100

So it is sufficient .

Hope that makes it clear.
If (x^2+y^2)+2xy > 200 and since x^2+y^2 > 2xy

Then (x^2+y^2)+(x^2+y^2) > 200 {You are adding something which greater than 2xy, So the sum should be definitely greater, right ?}.

Does that answer your question ?
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:51 am
anshumishra wrote:
For any two distinct numbers x and y : (x-y)^2 > 0
=> x^2 + y^2 > 2xy

So, statement 2 :

(x+y)^2 > 200
=> x^2+y^2+2xy > 200

=> 2(x^2+y^2) > 200
=> x^2 + y^2 > 100

So it is sufficient .

Hope that makes it clear.

If (x^2+y^2)+2xy > 200 and since x^2+y^2 > 2xy

Then (x^2+y^2)+(x^2+y^2) > 200 {You are adding something which greater than 2xy, So the sum should be definitely greater, right ?}.

Does that answer your question ?
You used the concept that the square of the difference of any two distant real numbers should always be greater than zero.
But they can be same as well.
As it is not given that x and y are different.........
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:09 pm
goyalsau wrote:
anshumishra wrote:
For any two distinct numbers x and y : (x-y)^2 > 0
=> x^2 + y^2 > 2xy

So, statement 2 :

(x+y)^2 > 200
=> x^2+y^2+2xy > 200

=> 2(x^2+y^2) > 200
=> x^2 + y^2 > 100

So it is sufficient .

Hope that makes it clear.

If (x^2+y^2)+2xy > 200 and since x^2+y^2 > 2xy

Then (x^2+y^2)+(x^2+y^2) > 200 {You are adding something which greater than 2xy, So the sum should be definitely greater, right ?}.

Does that answer your question ?
You used the concept that the square of the difference of any two distant real numbers should always be greater than zero.
But they can be same as well.
As it is not given that x and y are different.........
In any case X^2+Y^2 >= 2xy ("=" when x =y) Also, I have edited that in my first post
and You can substitute [x^2+Y^2 in place of 2xy, in the inequality : (x^2+y^2)+2xy > 200 ], to get the same result.[/i]
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion