BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Qn Please help

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS Qn Please help

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:02 am
Edit: The forum keeps corrupting my message, so I'm going to start again!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:09 am
Okay, hope this works:

First, note that x+1 must be positive. Otherwise 1/(x+1) would be negative, and couldn't lie within the given range.

So,

1/2 > 1/(x+1)
x+1 > 2
x > 1

Note that we can multiply both sides of the inequality by x+1 without needing to worry about whether we need to reverse the inequality, because we know x+1 is positive. We also have:

1/5 < 1/x+1
x+ 1 < 5
x < 4

So 1 < x < 4, and x could be 2 or 3. You don't actually need to do all this work. If you look again at the original inequality: 1/5 < 1/(x+1) < 1/2, then x+1 must be between 2 and 5, which gives two possible integer values, 2 or 3.

From Statement 2, (x-3)(x-4)=0, we know that (x-3) times (x-4) is 0. If you ever multiply two things and get zero, you must have multiplied by zero. Thus x-3 = 0, or x-4 = 0, and x = 3 or 4. Note that this is the basis of the mathematical technique called 'factoring', when solving quadratic equations, and it's the reason we always set one side to be equal to zero before factoring a quadratic. It's a very important idea to understand for the GMAT. So, we again get two possible solutions.

Together, the only possible value that is consistent with both statements is x=3. So the answer should be C.
Join the discussion

Re: DS Qn Please help

by gabriel » Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:21 am
Ian Stewart wrote:Edit: The forum keeps corrupting my message, so I'm going to start again!
Just check in the "Disable HTML in this post" option when you post and you should be able to post without any problem.
Join the discussion

Re: DS Qn Please help

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:15 am
gabriel wrote:
Ian Stewart wrote:Edit: The forum keeps corrupting my message, so I'm going to start again!
Just check in the "Disable HTML in this post" option when you post and you should be able to post without any problem.
Thanks Gabriel- that was definitely the issue.
Join the discussion