BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Inequality Practice

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon May 02, 2011 2:24 pm
tonebeeze wrote:Is XY > 0?

(1) X - Y > -2
(2) X - 2Y < -6
Statement 1: x > y-2
If y=2 and x= 1, is 1*2 > 0? Yes.
If y= -1 and x = 1, is 1*(-1) > 0? No.
Since the answer can both Yes and No, insufficient.

Statement 2: x < 2y-6
If y=1 and x = -10, is 1*(-10) > 0? No.
If y = 10 and x = 1, is 1*10 > 0? Yes.
Since the answer can be both No and Yes, insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Linking together the two statements, we get:
y-2 < x < 2y-6
y-2 < 2y-6
y > 4.
Since y > 4 and x > y-2, we know that x > 2.
Thus, x and y are both positive.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue May 03, 2011 8:18 am, edited 3 times in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by champmag » Tue May 03, 2011 4:14 am
Thanx guru...awesome explaination.
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Tue May 03, 2011 8:05 am
I got different values for x and y, but both are positive. Would someone tell me where am I wrong?

Here's what I did:

x - y > -2
-x + 2y > 6 (Note: x - 2y < -6 mutiplied by -1)
y > 4

x - 2y < -6
-2x + 2y < 4 (Note: x - y > -2 multiplied by -2)
-x < -2 Thus x > 2

I got y > 4 and x > 2 are these values correct?
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue May 03, 2011 10:24 am
MAAJ wrote:I got different values for x and y, but both are positive. Would someone tell me where am I wrong?

Here's what I did:

x - y > -2
-x + 2y > 6 (Note: x - 2y < -6 mutiplied by -1)
y > 4

x - 2y < -6
-2x + 2y < 4 (Note: x - y > -2 multiplied by -2)
-x < -2 Thus x > 2

I got y > 4 and x > 2 are these values correct?
It looks as though you submitted your post as I was editing a typo in mine. We got the same results.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Tue May 03, 2011 12:25 pm
Oh thanks! :)
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by xyzx5230 » Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:13 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
tonebeeze wrote:Is XY > 0?

(1) X - Y > -2
(2) X - 2Y < -6
Statement 1: x > y-2
If y=2 and x= 1, is 1*2 > 0? Yes.
If y= -1 and x = 1, is 1*(-1) > 0? No.
Since the answer can both Yes and No, insufficient.

Statement 2: x < 2y-6
If y=1 and x = -10, is 1*(-10) > 0? No.
If y = 10 and x = 1, is 1*10 > 0? Yes.
Since the answer can be both No and Yes, insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Linking together the two statements, we get:
y-2 < x < 2y-6
y-2 < 2y-6
y > 4.
Since y > 4 and x > y-2, we know that x > 2.
Thus, x and y are both positive.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
I did solve the question in similar manner. But is it okay to add Y and 2Y (read variables)in above equations even though we don't know their signs?
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:57 pm
xyzx5230 wrote:I did solve the question in similar manner. But is it okay to add Y and 2Y (read variables)in above equations even though we don't know their signs?
Adding is always fine - your inequalities won't flip.

Subtracting is NOT necessarily fine, however - you have to recognize that subtract is like adding by a negative, so your inequality will flip.

For example:

x > y
2x > 3 - y

Adding these together, I get 3x > 3, or x > 1.

But let's say I wanted to subtract one from the other. Many people would do

(x > y)
- (2x > 3 - y)
----------------
-x > 2y - 3

But this is INCORRECT.

(x > y) - (2x > 3 - y) is really

(x > y) + -(2x > 3 - y), or

(x > y) + (-2x < y - 3), or

(x > y)
+ (y - 3 > -2x), or

x + y - 3 > y - 2x, or

x - 3 > -2x, or

3x > 3, or x > 1
Join the discussion