BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS from manhattangmat

Expert replies
by vertigo05 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:29 am
Anthony and Michael sit on the six-member board of directors for company X. If the board is to be split up into 2 three-person subcommittees, what percent of all the possible subcommittees that include Michael also include Anthony?

A. 20%
B. 30%
C. 40%
D. 50%
E. 60%
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gauravgundal » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:14 pm
Join the discussion

by vinayakdl » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:07 am
gaurav but no body ever posted an OA on that. I dont agree with 40%.

I think D:50%

vertigo05, it will be great if you can post OA here or on the original thread.


Vinayak
Join the discussion

by raghavsarathy » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:16 am
IMO - A

No of subcommitees in which both of them are together =4

Total number of subcommmitees = 6C3 = 20

Hence required probablity = 4/20 = 20%
Join the discussion

by vertigo05 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:27 am
i should have submitted this question in PS section. anyways, the OA is 40% can anybody explain it with proper justification?
Join the discussion

by kaulnikhil » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:40 am
let us name the members
Mark Anthony X1 X2 X3 X4

now when mark and anthony are together

MARK ANthony X1 ---- X2 X3 X4
simlarly replace X1 by X2
MARK ANthony X2 ---- X1 X3 X4
now replace X2 by X3
MARK ANthony X3 ---- X2 X1 X4
now replace X3 by X4
MARK ANthony X4 ---- X2 X3 X1

these are the cases when both are together --4 such cases

now when they not together
M X1 X2 ---------------A X3 X4
M X1 X3---------------A X2 X4
M X1 x4 --------------A X2 X3

M X2 X3 ------------- A X1 X4
M X2 X4 ----------------A X1 X3

M X3 X4 ----------------A X1 X2
these comes to 6

so favourable cases = 4/10*100= 40


Join the discussion

by raghavsarathy » Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:43 pm
raghavsarathy wrote:IMO - A

No of subcommitees in which both of them are together =4

Total number of subcommmitees = 6C3 = 20

Hence required probablity = 4/20 = 20%
Why can't we say that the total number of subcommitees =6C3 ?

I am not able to understand clearly.

Kindly help
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:41 pm
raghavsarathy wrote:
raghavsarathy wrote:IMO - A

No of subcommitees in which both of them are together =4

Total number of subcommmitees = 6C3 = 20

Hence required probablity = 4/20 = 20%
Why can't we say that the total number of subcommitees =6C3 ?

I am not able to understand clearly.

Kindly help
6C3 is wrong because the two groups are similar in the sense that when you select 3 out of 6, the other groups member are automatically getting selected.
it's like this, how many ways you can separate AB into 2 different alphabets.
its not two ways. Only one way. alphabets A and B are different but the groups you are dividing them into are similar
back to problem.
total number of ways =6C3/2!= 10
total numbers ways when anthony and michael are together =4C1=4 ways
4/10= 40%
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion