BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS - First Timer

Expert replies
by Valerieangelkos » Wed May 15, 2013 5:04 pm
Hi,
I have a question regarding DS questions.
If the choice, either (1) or (2), gives an answer to a specific question, being YES or NO, should I choose it because it gives a specific answer, or because the answer it gives is YES?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed May 15, 2013 5:17 pm
I'm not 100% sure I understand your question.

Everything comes down to whether or not a statement provides enough information to answer a target question with absolute certainty.

So, for example, if the target question is a YES/NO question, as in "Is k a prime number?", then we need to determine whether or not a statement provides enough information to state either "yes, k is definitely a prime number or "no, k is definitely not a prime number." If we can definitively answer the question (either yes or no), then the statement is sufficient.

If the target question is a VALUE question, as in "What is the value of k?", then we need to determine whether or not a statement provides enough information to state "the value of k must be ...... " If we can do this, then the statement is sufficient.

For more information about this, you might want to watch our free video that covers this particular question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1098

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by fcabanski » Fri May 17, 2013 8:13 am
The statement is sufficient if it answers the question. If the question is a yes/no question, and the statement lets you know the answer is no, then the statement is sufficient.
Expert GMAT tutor.
[email protected]

If you find one of my answers helpful, please click thank.

Contact me to discuss online GMAT tutoring.
Join the discussion

definitive no answer

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri May 17, 2013 8:38 am
A definitive YES or a definitive NO answer would each be sufficient. Only an answer of MAYBE (or "sometimes yes, sometimes no") would be insufficient.

However, "definitive NO is sufficient" is not a rule that the GMAT tests regularly. For most YES/NO questions, a statement that gives sufficient information will give a "yes" answer to the question.

Out of the DS problems in OG13 and the Quant Supplement 2nd Ed, only 1 that I can find has statements that give a definitive "no" answer:
DS #136 OG13
If @ represents one of the operations +, -, and x , is k @ (L + m) = (k @ L) + (k @ m) for all numbers k, L , and m ?

(1) k @ 1 is not equal to 1 @ k for some numbers k.

(2) @ represents subtraction.
(The actual problem used a circle, not an @ symbol, but I don't know how to recreate that here!)

We can rephrase the question as "does the operation @ represent multiplication?" as multiplication is the only operation for which k @ (L + m) = (k @ L) + (k @ m)

(1) k @ 1 is not equal to 1 @ k for some numbers k.

If these two are not equal, then @ must NOT represent multiplication, because k*1 = 1*k. Therefore, the answer to the question "is @ multiplication?" is "no, definitely not." Sufficient.

(2) @ represents subtraction.

Again, the answer to the question "is @ multiplication?" is "no, definitely not." Sufficient.

The answer is D.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion