BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS--distance problem

Expert replies
by kris610 » Mon May 26, 2008 1:59 pm
Two cars , L and M, start at the same time and travel side-by-side along a straight road in the same direction until one of the cars is 50 km farther than the other. At the time, how long will have each car traveled?

A) At that time, car L will have traveled 1.5Km for every 1Km traveled by M.

B) At the time, M will traveled at a rate of 50 Km/Hr.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by chidcguy » Mon May 26, 2008 2:20 pm
What is the OA?

L= Distance traveled by L;
M= Distance traveled by M;

Either L-M=50 or M-L =50

(1) L=1.5M

So that means L-M=50 and NOT M-L =50

2 unknowns and two different eq's can solve L & M ( B , C, E are out)

(2) Speed of M= 50 KMPH

We do not how long M traveled to find out the distance he traveled and we also do not know any thing about D. So B & D are out.

Is OA A?
Join the discussion

by kris610 » Tue May 27, 2008 5:40 am
From A we can infer that the ratio of the distances is (d+50)/d = 1.5. From this we can see that one has traveled 100 Km and the other 150Km. A is SUFF. The OA was C, but I disagree.
Join the discussion

Re: DS--distance problem

by mim3 » Tue May 27, 2008 10:11 am
kris610 wrote:Two cars , L and M, start at the same time and travel side-by-side along a straight road in the same direction until one of the cars is 50 km farther than the other. At the time, how long will have each car traveled?

A) At that time, car L will have traveled 1.5Km for every 1Km traveled by M.

B) At the time, M will traveled at a rate of 50 Km/Hr.
We're looking for how long will each car have traveled- not how far. If it were how far, then A would be sufficient. However, we need to know the speed of each car to determine the time.

a) From this we know that car L is traveling 50% faster than car M. So we know that when car L is 50km ahead of M, L will have traveled 150km and M, 100km. However, we don't know how it will take because we don't know the speed. Insufficient.

b) M travels at 50kph. The missing piece to the equation, but by itself, it's insufficient.

1&2 together: Sufficient. We don't have to do the computation, but if we did, M travels at 50kpm, L then travels at 75kph. They will have traveled for 2 hours to get to distances of 150km and 100km.
Join the discussion

by netigen » Tue May 27, 2008 11:52 am
Ans is C

A) Insufficient because speed is not provide. We can only derive that L is faster than M and that L traveled 150Km and M 100Km

B) insufficient because it only gives speed of M

together sufficient, time for M= time for L =2 hour
Join the discussion