BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS - Absolute value

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:03 pm
If z>y>x>w>0, is y-w = z-x?

1. y-w = |x-z|

2. ((w^2 - z^2)/(z-w)) = ((x^2 - y^2)/(y-x))

IMO B, but OA is D
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sam2304 » Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:42 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:If z>y>x>w>0, is y-w = z-x?

1. y-w = |x-z|
Split into two equations

y-w = x-z --- 1
y-w = z-x --- 2
With the condition z>y>x>w>0, y-w is +ve and x-z is -ve from 1. z-x is again +ve and is equal to y-w from 2. z-x and x-z will result in same absolute value only the sign changes, so y-w = |x-z|
2. ((w^2 - z^2)/(z-w)) = ((x^2 - y^2)/(y-x))
You already know this. Simply factorize it and then cancel the like terms.

IMO D.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:17 pm
Sorry abt tht......i couldnt get it
sam2304 wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:If z>y>x>w>0, is y-w = z-x?

1. y-w = |x-z|
Split into two equations

y-w = x-z --- 1
y-w = z-x --- 2
With the condition z>y>x>w>0, y-w is +ve and x-z is -ve from 1. z-x is again +ve and is equal to y-w from 2. z-x and x-z will result in same absolute value only the sign changes, so y-w = |x-z|
2. ((w^2 - z^2)/(z-w)) = ((x^2 - y^2)/(y-x))
You already know this. Simply factorize it and then cancel the like terms.

IMO D.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion

by bobdylan » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:30 am
I got B! I thought that if you multiply by -1, you need to multiply the whole equation, and not just one side. So statement 1 could be or could not be.
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:40 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:Sorry abt tht......i couldnt get it
We are asked to find whether y-w = z-x ? This simplifies to one thing "does both y - w and z - x result in same value".

We need some more data to prove that y-w = z-x say some values or some eqns stating that they are equal. We know z > y > x > w > 0. Everything is positive.

1.y-w = |x-z|

Let w,x,y,z be 1,2,3,4.
y-w = |x-z|
=> 3-1 = |2-4|
=> 2 = |-2|
=> 2 = 2

x-z and z-x will have same absolute value and since everything is positive and z > x will result in a positive value. With 1 we get a -ve value and modulo of that will give us z-x.

Does that clarify your doubt ? If you cannot solve it algebraically use numbers.
Last edited by sam2304 on Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:59 am
@sam in your explanation thread please edit this typo error
Let w,x,y,z be 1,2,3,4.
y-z = |x-z|
=> 3-1 = |2-4|
=> 2 = |-2|
=> 2 = 2
sam2304 wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Sorry abt tht......i couldnt get it
We are asked to find whether y-w = z-x ? This simplifies to one thing "does both y - w and z - x result in same value".

We need some more data to prove that y-w = z-x say some values or some eqns stating that they are equal. We know z > y > x > w > 0. Everything is positive.

1.y-w = |x-z|

Let w,x,y,z be 1,2,3,4.
y-z = |x-z|
=> 3-1 = |2-4|
=> 2 = |-2|
=> 2 = 2

x-z and z-x will have same absolute value and since everything is positive and z > x will result in a positive value. With 1 we get a -ve value and modulo of that will give us z-x.

Does that clarify your doubt ? If you cannot solve it algebraically use numbers.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:03 am
For me the doubt is cleared.....thanks for your explanation
sam2304 wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Sorry abt tht......i couldnt get it
We are asked to find whether y-w = z-x ? This simplifies to one thing "does both y - w and z - x result in same value".

We need some more data to prove that y-w = z-x say some values or some eqns stating that they are equal. We know z > y > x > w > 0. Everything is positive.

1.y-w = |x-z|

Let w,x,y,z be 1,2,3,4.
y-z = |x-z|
=> 3-1 = |2-4|
=> 2 = |-2|
=> 2 = 2

x-z and z-x will have same absolute value and since everything is positive and z > x will result in a positive value. With 1 we get a -ve value and modulo of that will give us z-x.

Does that clarify your doubt ? If you cannot solve it algebraically use numbers.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:34 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:For me the doubt is cleared.....thanks for your explanation
sam2304 wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Sorry abt tht......i couldnt get it
We are asked to find whether y-w = z-x ? This simplifies to one thing "does both y - w and z - x result in same value".

We need some more data to prove that y-w = z-x say some values or some eqns stating that they are equal. We know z > y > x > w > 0. Everything is positive.

1.y-w = |x-z|

Let w,x,y,z be 1,2,3,4.
y-z = |x-z|
=> 3-1 = |2-4|
=> 2 = |-2|
=> 2 = 2

x-z and z-x will have same absolute value and since everything is positive and z > x will result in a positive value. With 1 we get a -ve value and modulo of that will give us z-x.

Does that clarify your doubt ? If you cannot solve it algebraically use numbers.
Done with the edit. Hope its clear. I know I did a pathetic job in explaining the problem, because I couldn't write down my thoughts clearly maybe you can wait for someone else as well to pour in their thoughts to get a better understanding.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:03 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:If z>y>x>w>0, is y-w = z-x?

1. y-w = |x-z|

2. ((w^2 - z^2)/(z-w)) = ((x^2 - y^2)/(y-x))
Statement 1: y-w = |x-z|
|x-z| is the DISTANCE between x and z.
The distance between two values must be NON-NEGATIVE.
Since x<z, the distance between x and z = z-x.
In other words, |x-z| = z-x.
Substituting |x-z| = z-x into y-w = |x-z|, we get:
y-w = z-x.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: (w² - z²)/(z-w) = (x² - y²)/(y-x)
(w+z)(w-z) / (z-w) = (x+y)(x-y) / (y-x)
(w+z)(w-z) / (w-z) = (x+y)(x-y) / (x-y)
w+z = x+y
z-x = y-w.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by hey_thr67 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:52 am
What is the source of this problem ?
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:06 pm
Source: Knewton GMAT
hey_thr67 wrote:What is the source of this problem ?
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:07 pm
Thanks for the briefing MITCH
GMATGuruNY wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:If z>y>x>w>0, is y-w = z-x?

1. y-w = |x-z|

2. ((w^2 - z^2)/(z-w)) = ((x^2 - y^2)/(y-x))
Statement 1: y-w = |x-z|
|x-z| is the DISTANCE between x and z.
The distance between two values must be NON-NEGATIVE.
Since x<z, the distance between x and z = z-x.
In other words, |x-z| = z-x.
Substituting |x-z| = z-x into y-w = |x-z|, we get:
y-w = z-x.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: (w² - z²)/(z-w) = (x² - y²)/(y-x)
(w+z)(w-z) / (z-w) = (x+y)(x-y) / (y-x)
(w+z)(w-z) / (w-z) = (x+y)(x-y) / (x-y)
w+z = x+y
z-x = y-w.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Join the discussion