BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS #500 Test 8 - 24

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mschling52 » Tue May 08, 2007 7:28 am
Is the answer B?

I don't usually try to pick numbers for a problem like this, but prefer to work with the equations instead.

(1) gives us z > x + y + 1. Rearranging, we have z - x - y > 1. From the stem, x+y+z>0, or z > -x - y. Therefore,

2z > z - x - y > 1. So, 2z>1 implies z>(1/2). Not Sufficient.

(2) gives us x+y < -1, so for x+y+z to be positive, z must be greater than 1. Sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Tue May 08, 2007 12:07 pm
Totally up to the individual as to whether to pick real numbers - whatever is easier for you. Just remember that we all make fewer mistakes with real numbers than we do with algebra.

For inequality problems like this one, you can add or subtract the inequalities (just like you can add or subtract equations). You just have to make sure that the greater than or less than signs point in the same direction

So, for (1), for example, you can do:
x + y + z > 0
- [x + y + 1 > 0]
= z - 1 > 0
= z > 1 Sufficient
[IGNORE the above calculations - I copied statement 2 here instead of statement 1 by accident - see later post]

(2):
x + y + z > 0
- [0 > x + y + 1]
= x + y + z > x + y + 1
= z > 1 Sufficient

D
Last edited by Stacey Koprince on Wed May 09, 2007 1:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by mschling52 » Tue May 08, 2007 1:29 pm
Hi Stacey,

Can you expand a bit on how you manipulated statement (2) in your response (I think this is actually statement (1) in the problem as given). From how you did the subtraction of the inequalities in the first part of your response, I would think that

x + y + z > 0
- [0 > x + y + 1]
= x + y + z > -x - y - 1
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Tue May 08, 2007 10:11 pm
Oops - that subtraction sign was supposed to be an addition sign. :) Thanks for the catch!

x + y + z > 0 (this statement is given in the question)
+ [0 > x + y + 1] (this statement is given as statement 2)
= x + y + z > x + y + 1
etc

Note that the second equation is statement 2, as written in the first post in this thread. I just wrote it the other way around (0 first instead of last) so that I could put the two inequality signs in the same direction.
24. If x + y + z > 0, is z > 1?
(1) z > x + y +1
(2) x + y + 1 < 0
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by mendiratta » Wed May 09, 2007 2:51 am
(1) gives us z > x + y + 1. Rearranging, we have z - x - y > 1. From the stem, x+y+z>0, or z > -x - y. Therefore,

2z > z - x - y > 1. So, 2z>1 implies z>(1/2). Not Sufficient.
Stacey Koprince, can you pls explain what is wrong with above explanation?..because I'm also getting B as solution.
anyway, what is OA?
Join the discussion

by mschling52 » Wed May 09, 2007 5:10 am
Stacey,

In your original response aren't you using Statement (2) twice? Just adding it in one case and subtracting it in another? If you use your method and statement (1), I think you come up with

x+y+z>0 (from stem)
+[z>x+y+1] (from Stmt 1)

Adding these gives,

x+y+2z > x+y+1
2z>1
z>(1/2),

which is the same thing I came up with from Statement 1 in my original response.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed May 09, 2007 1:49 pm
Oh, I see - it wasn't statement 2 that I mis-read, it was statement 1 (or rather, I copied statement 2 twice by accident and never did statement 1 at all). Got it! Sorry about that!

Okay, let's try this again.

Statement 1:
Given x + y + z > 0
(1) z > x + y +1

Yes, if I add these, I get:
x + y + 2z > x + y + 1
2z > 1
z > 1/2

Which is a "maybe" so insufficient. :)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by gviren » Sun May 20, 2007 11:32 am
24. If x + y + z > 0, is z > 1?
(1) z > x + y +1
(2) x + y + 1 < 0


(1) ---- z - x - y - 1 > 0 Adding it with x + y + z > 0

2z - 1 > 0 ; Z > 1/2 hence not true

(2) -( x + y + 1 ) > 0 ; Adding it with x + y + z > 0

z - 1 > 0 ; z > 1 true
Join the discussion