BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ds 3

Expert replies
by resilient » Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:24 pm
i was stuck on the wording here. The question asks for the YOUNGEST but statement 2 explains of the younger 2. This cant technically explain of the the youngest.

qa is b
Attachments
ds3.jpg
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by codesnooker » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:15 am
It is actually very simple question but trick is hidden in its text. So lets try to solve this interesting puzzle.

From the question stem we know that,

Sum of Money = $ 200,000 = M
Number of beneficiaries = 4

Who are the beneficiaries?
Ans: One Spouse, and three childern

Lets assign the variables to these people.

Spouse = S
(Children in decreasing order of their age)
1st Child = Fc
2nd Child = Sc
3rd Child = Tc


So,

S + Fc + Sc + Tc = 200,000

Now let's take condition (1).


S = M/2 = $ 100,000
Fc = (1/4) (M/2) = M/8 = $ 12,500


Now the remaining money should be divided between Sc and Tc. But there is no condition provided how it should be divided among them. So, we can't say how much Tc is going to get.

Hence Statement (1), INSUFFICIENT.

I hope till now it must be clear to you why your selected answer is wrong.

Now let's concentrate on statement (2):

It states that two younger children (that is: Sc + Tc) receives $12,500 more than Fc.

Sc + Tc = Fc + 12,500

AND

It also states that the two younger children receives $62,500 less than spouse.

Sc + Tc = S - 62,500

Now as we know that, S + Fc + Sc + Tc = 200,000

Now as there are 4 variables in the above equation and both Fc and S are in a equal relation to Sc and Tc, so it means that both Sc and Tc going to share the equal amount of money. I know, its bit difficult to understand this concept, but this is the fact and you need to digest it.

So lets consider, Sc = Y. Therefore, Tc = Y
Hence,

2Y = Fc + 12500 ----> Equation 1

and
2Y = S - 62500 ----> Equation 2
and also,
2Y + S + Fc = 200000 ----> Equation 3

Now add equation 1 and equation 2,

4Y = S + Fc - 50000

It means, S + Fc = 4Y + 50000

Place the value in equation 3,

2Y + 4Y + 50000 = 200000


Now from here you can easily compute the value of Y (that is the youngest child's share).

Hence Statement (2) is alone SUFFICIENT.

Hope this helps...
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:31 am
codesnooker,

B is what I chose too, and your explanation makes sense. BUT, from the poster's screenshot it looks like the OA is A.

what gives?
Join the discussion

no

by resilient » Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:53 am
no no i just guessed on choice a. its wrong and very obviously but still trying to reason out of choice b. Equations are great if you are wired that way, but Im a mapper and map information out and reason my way out. Its a preference issue.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:36 am
oh ok, so B is right..cool
Join the discussion

Re: no

by codesnooker » Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:08 pm
resilient wrote:no no i just guessed on choice a. its wrong and very obviously but still trying to reason out of choice b. Equations are great if you are wired that way, but Im a mapper and map information out and reason my way out. Its a preference issue.
Actually Resilient, there is no need to solve the question. I just wired it into equation so that one who reads can easily comprehend the solution. In real world, I don't even touch pen for the DS questions and still my hit ratio is more than 90%. Frankly speaking it saves my 50% of time by applying this approach.

You can also solve this even in your mind.

HOW?

Lets conclude in our mind, what information do we have:-

1. We have 4 people who are going to get money.
2. We know total money.
3. We know the relation of two younger children with first child and spouse.
4. Both younger child have equal relations with other two dependent members.

Hence, we can conclude that they will share equal amount of money and now we know the relation also between each member, hence we can derive the money for the youngest child.

It's done and I will just hit the answer, rather than picking up the pen and jotting down the information. I feel to do it with CR approach rather than following it as a PS question.

However, it depends upon personal preference.
Join the discussion