Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

DS-15

Expert replies
by desihokie » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:10 am
powerprep Q
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by StarDust845 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:29 am
Join the discussion

by desihokie » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:51 am
nope, the answer is C
Join the discussion

by StarDust845 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:15 am
Yeah it's a C.

Let S1 be sum of salaries of m managers and S2 be that of d directors.

S1/m = (S1 + S2)/(m+d) - 5000 -- (1)
S2/d = (S1 + S2)/(m+d) + 15000 -- (2)

From (1) we get S1 = m(S1+S2)/(m+d) - 5000m
From (2) we get S2 = d(S1+S2)/(m+d) + 15000d

Adding both we get S1 + S2 = S1 + S2 + 15000d - 5000m
Then 15000d = 5000m hence we know the ratio of m to d and hence we can calculate the one that is asked in the question.

ahhh.. I should calculate more carefully.

Calista.
Join the discussion

by cris » Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:34 pm
Excuse me Calista but I dont see how you get, when adding both statements, that "m(S1+S2)/(m+d)" is S1 and that "d(S1+S2)/(m+d)" is S2.

....S1= m(S1+S2)/(m+d) - 5000m by saying that only "m(S1+S2)/(m+d)" equals S1 I dont see how that can be possible....

The same with S2. If S2= d(S1+S2)/(m+d) + 15000d, how can you say that only "d(S1+S2)/(m+d)" equals S2??

Could you explain that?...thanks!
Join the discussion

by camitava » Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:31 am
cris wrote:Excuse me Calista but I dont see how you get, when adding both statements, that "m(S1+S2)/(m+d)" is S1 and that "d(S1+S2)/(m+d)" is S2.

....S1= m(S1+S2)/(m+d) - 5000m by saying that only "m(S1+S2)/(m+d)" equals S1 I dont see how that can be possible....

The same with S2. If S2= d(S1+S2)/(m+d) + 15000d, how can you say that only "d(S1+S2)/(m+d)" equals S2??

Could you explain that?...thanks!
cris, Calista was not doing as u thought!
Are u agree with the two equs -
S1 = m(S1+S2)/(m+d) - 5000m -- (1)
S2 = d(S1+S2)/(m+d) + 15000d -- (2) ?
Now add this two equ.,
so (S1 + S2) = (m + d)(S1 + S2)/(m + d) - 5000m + 15000d
or (S1 + S2) = (S1 + S2) - 5000m + 15000d
--- Got me now, Cris?
Request you to do this with pen-n-paper and the u will find that the confusion will go away!
Yop! Again, IMO C - I agree with the approach Calista has given ...
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by cris » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:12 pm
Camitava thanks a lot!

I did a mistake following up the explanation....I did it with pen and peaper got it!
Join the discussion

by stellategang » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:34 pm
wow, props to you guys

i would never figure this one out in a ZILLION years
Join the discussion