BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS 1

Expert replies
by dmateer25 » Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:13 am
Is x – 1/16 greater than 5/8?

(1) Four times the value of x is less than three.

(2) One third of two is less than the value of x.


E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS 1

by parallel_chase » Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:56 am
dmateer25 wrote:Is x – 1/16 greater than 5/8?

(1) Four times the value of x is less than three.

(2) One third of two is less than the value of x.


E
Question stem x -1/16 > 5/8

x > 5/8 + 1/16
x > 11/16 ?


Statement I
4x < 3
x < 12/16
X could be greater than 11/16 and less than 11/16, insufficient.

Statement II

2/3 < x

first statement it worked fine, but second statement I cant think of anything except to actually calculate 11/16 and see if it matches both the statements. But then again I cant think of any other way how to get this thing done.

Whats the source?
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

Re: DS 1

by Mozartain » Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:01 am
dmateer25 wrote:Is x &#8211; 1/16 greater than 5/8?

(1) Four times the value of x is less than three.

(2) One third of two is less than the value of x.


E
question asks if x>5/8+1/16 ie x>11/16
Stmt I says
4x<3
x<3/4
x<12/16
so we can't find if x is greater or less than 11/16

Stmt II says
2/3<x
x>2/3
now we can't readily compare 2/3 with 11/16 and it seems they are pretty close to each other.
2/3=32/48
and 11/16=33/48
since x>32/48 we can't say if x is greater or less than 33/48

taking both statements together, we see that
36/48 (ie 3/4)>x>32/48
x can still be greater or less than 33/48

so E.
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:14 am
The source is MGMAT Cat.

This just took me too long to figure out that it was E.

Here is the OE

Image
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:19 am
Well I dont like there explanation 1 bit, i think Mozartain has done a better job than MGMAT.

@Mozartain - Nice work!
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by Mozartain » Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:25 am
parallel_chase wrote:Well I dont like there explanation 1 bit, i think Mozartain has done a better job than MGMAT.

@Mozartain - Nice work!
glad that you liked it. but i reckon converting to decimals might be a better idea for many people.
Join the discussion