BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS-02

Expert replies
by Sumit69 » Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:26 pm
On certain sight seeing tour , the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2 . What was the number of men on the sight seeing tour?

(i) On the sight seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11
(ii) The number of women on the sight seeing tour was less than 30.

Please help me solve it and how?

OA -c
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS-02

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:34 pm
Sumit69 wrote:On certain sight seeing tour , the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2 . What was the number of men on the sight seeing tour?

(i) On the sight seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11
(ii) The number of women on the sight seeing tour was less than 30.

Please help me solve it and how?
We should be able to very quickly narrow it down to (c) or (e).

(1) just gives a ratio. From all ratios, it's impossible to determine the value of any of the parts: insufficient.

(2) still no info about men: insufficient.

Together: at first glance, it looks like we don't have enough information. However, we have to remember that the GMAT doesn't violate reality. Even though it's not expressly stated in the question, when we're dealing with indivisible objects, such as people, our solution will always involve integers (e.g. you'll never end up with 4.7 men in a room).

In this case, we know that:

w/c = 5/2
c/m = 5/11

and if we write the ratio of all 3 in terms of the lowest common denominators, we get:

w/c/m = 25:10:22

Accordingly, we know that the number of women must be a multiple of 25 and, if there are fewer than 30 women, there must be 25.

Once we solve for w, we can certainly solve for m as well: choose (C).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Sumit69 » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:47 pm
Thanks Stuart. I need to tease my brain more :).
Join the discussion