BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

doubt SC A 7

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 46 times
by aditya8062 » Sun Dec 06, 2015 8:21 pm
The growth of Hand.Inc depends on its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing networks to spend money to promote its phones.

A) its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing

B) its ability to attract developers who write applications for phones and to convince

C) whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince

D) if it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince

E) whether or not it has the capability to attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince

my concern: parallelism in B seems equally viable ,though with a different meaning .the proclaimed answer is C .however i feel that parallelism in C can be interpreted in the following way too : whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and [to] convince---->this meaning would be nonsensical
ALSO how do we reject the different meaning (in B) ,which seems equally viable

thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pmFollowed by: 34 members
Thanked: 448 times
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Dec 29, 2015 2:57 am
I have faced similar issue in past. I was told to stick to the meaning provided by part {A}.
R A H U L
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:01 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 1 times

by Amrabdelnaby » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:42 pm
I thought about b and c for sometime then I decided to remove the fluff in both sentences and look at them like this:
Its ability to attract and to convince vs whether it can attract and convince
The second one (c) seemed more appealing and correct
I see ur concern that c might have a double meaning yet, it is more right

aditya8062 wrote:The growth of Hand.Inc depends on its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing networks to spend money to promote its phones.

A) its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing

B) its ability to attract developers who write applications for phones and to convince

C) whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince

D) if it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince

E) whether or not it has the capability to attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince

my concern: parallelism in B seems equally viable ,though with a different meaning .the proclaimed answer is C .however i feel that parallelism in C can be interpreted in the following way too : whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and [to] convince---->this meaning would be nonsensical
ALSO how do we reject the different meaning (in B) ,which seems equally viable

thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jain2016 » Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:55 pm
I also marked B.

@Experts, Please shed some light on this.

Thanks,

SJ
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:49 am

by shona04 » Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:21 am
I feel it should be B, since it is parallel and maintains the meaning of original sentence.
adding whether in the statement makes it ambiguous, since it is later accompanied with and convince
OA and suggestions pls
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1