The growth of Hand.Inc depends on its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing networks to spend money to promote its phones.
A) its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing
B) its ability to attract developers who write applications for phones and to convince
C) whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince
D) if it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince
E) whether or not it has the capability to attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince
my concern: parallelism in B seems equally viable ,though with a different meaning .the proclaimed answer is C .however i feel that parallelism in C can be interpreted in the following way too : whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and [to] convince---->this meaning would be nonsensical
ALSO how do we reject the different meaning (in B) ,which seems equally viable
thanks
A) its ability for attracting developers to write applications for its phones and convincing
B) its ability to attract developers who write applications for phones and to convince
C) whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince
D) if it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince
E) whether or not it has the capability to attract developers to write applications for its phones and convince
my concern: parallelism in B seems equally viable ,though with a different meaning .the proclaimed answer is C .however i feel that parallelism in C can be interpreted in the following way too : whether it can attract developers to write applications for its phones and [to] convince---->this meaning would be nonsensical
ALSO how do we reject the different meaning (in B) ,which seems equally viable
thanks
